scholarly journals High-dimensional structure learning of sparse vector autoregressive models using fractional marginal pseudo-likelihood

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimmo Suotsalo ◽  
Yingying Xu ◽  
Jukka Corander ◽  
Johan Pensar

AbstractLearning vector autoregressive models from multivariate time series is conventionally approached through least squares or maximum likelihood estimation. These methods typically assume a fully connected model which provides no direct insight to the model structure and may lead to highly noisy estimates of the parameters. Because of these limitations, there has been an increasing interest towards methods that produce sparse estimates through penalized regression. However, such methods are computationally intensive and may become prohibitively time-consuming when the number of variables in the model increases. In this paper we adopt an approximate Bayesian approach to the learning problem by combining fractional marginal likelihood and pseudo-likelihood. We propose a novel method, PLVAR, that is both faster and produces more accurate estimates than the state-of-the-art methods based on penalized regression. We prove the consistency of the PLVAR estimator and demonstrate the attractive performance of the method on both simulated and real-world data.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janne Adolf ◽  
Tim Loossens ◽  
francis tuerlinckx ◽  
Eva Ceulemans

Autoregressive and vector autoregressive models are a driving force in current psychological research. In affect research they are for instance frequently used to formalize affective processes and estimate affective dynamics. Discrete-time model variants are most commonly used, but continuous-time formulations are gaining popularity, because they can handle data from longitudinal studies in which the sampling rate varies within the study period, and yield results that can be compared across data sets from studies with different sampling rates. However, whether and how the sampling rate affects the quality with which such continuous-time models can be estimated, has largely been ignored in the literature. In the present paper, we show how the sampling rate affects the estimation reliability (i.e., the standard errors of the parameter estimators, with smaller values indicating higher reliability) of continuous-time autoregressive and vector autoregressive models. Moreover, we determine which sampling rates are optimal in the sense that they lead to standard errors of minimal size (subject to the assumption that the models are correct). Our results are based on the theories of optimal design and maximum likelihood estimation. We illustrate them making use of data from the COGITO Study. We formulate recommendations for study planning, and elaborate on strengths and limitations of our approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document