Oceans and the Law of the Sea at the UN General Assembly

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 53-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari Hakapää
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-59
Author(s):  
Yann-huei Song

Abstract This article surveys the declarations or statements made by the States or entities under Articles 287, 298, and 310 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea over the past thirty years when they signed, ratified, or acceded to the LOS Convention, or at any time thereafter, with regard to the interpretation and application of certain provisions contained in the Convention. This study shows that differences regarding the interpretation or application of the provisions of the Convention can be found in the declarations and statements made by States located in different geographical regions. The author suggests that a possible way to amend the Convention is to include an item for discussion in the agenda of future meetings of the UN General Assembly, the UN Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea, or State Parties to the Convention.


2021 ◽  
pp. 231-245
Author(s):  
Surabhi Ranganathan

This chapter explores whether and what might have changed had one famous speech not been made. The speech in question was Arvid Pardo’s November 1967 address to the First Committee of the UN General Assembly. Through the lens of tracking Pardo’s contribution which is both over- and understated in the literature, the chapter discusses why in the 1960s and after, states, international lawyers, and even civil society organisations became and have remained invested in the unlikely project of deep seabed mining. By retrieving the contingencies of the moment in which the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea was drafted and its provisions and concepts given fixed associations, the chapter argues for radical readings that might be truer to that treaty’s constitutional promise.


2012 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 322-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald McRae

On November 17, 2011, the UN General Assembly elected the members of the International Law Commission for the next five years. In the course of the quinquennium that was completed in August 2011 with the end of the sixty-third session, the Commission concluded four major topics on its agenda: the law of transboundary aquifers, the responsibility of international organizations, the effect of armed conflicts on treaties, and reservations to treaties. It was by any standard a substantial output. The beginning of a new quinquennium now provides an opportunity to assess what the Commission has achieved, to consider the way it operates, and to reflect on what lies ahead for it.


1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-465
Author(s):  
Shabtai Rosenne

AbstractThis article continues the annual survey of matters connected with the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea during the year 1998. It follows on the similar survey published in a previous volume of this journal. It is structured in the same way, dealing in order with the 1998 Meeting of States Parties and relevant matters from the 53rd session of the United Nations General Assembly, and is concluded with an account of the Tribunal's work in 1998.1


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document