scholarly journals Buccal Fat Pad: A Useful Adjunct Flap in Cleft Palate Repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wasiu L. Adeyemo ◽  
Adebayo A. Ibikunle ◽  
Olutayo James ◽  
Olanrewaju A. Taiwo
2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1381-1385
Author(s):  
Benjamin K. L. Goh ◽  
Hui-Ling Chia

We describe a case of the combined use of acellular dermal matrix and pedicled buccal fat pad (BFP) in a wide U-shaped cleft palate repair. Acellular dermal matrix was used as a “patch” repair for the nasal mucosa defect as opposed to the conventional inlay graft. The advantages include reduced cost and a smaller avascular graft load. Lateral relaxing incisions were made to ensure tension-free closure of oromucosa at midline. Lateral oromucosa defect closure with well-vascularized pedicled BFP ensures enhanced healing, less palatal contracture and shortening, and reduced infection. The palate healed with mucosalization at 2 weeks, and no complications were noted at 6 months follow-up.


2009 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 1018-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Levi ◽  
Steven J. Kasten ◽  
Steven R. Buchman

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 909-914
Author(s):  
Rachel Skladman ◽  
Lynn Marty Grames ◽  
Gary Skolnick ◽  
Dennis C. Nguyen ◽  
Sybill D. Naidoo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110174
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Cawthorn ◽  
Anna R. Todd ◽  
Nina Hardcastle ◽  
Adam O. Spencer ◽  
A. Robertson Harrop ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the development process and clinical impact of implementing a standardized perioperative clinical care pathway for cleft palate repair. Design: Medical records of patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair prior to pathway implementation were retrospectively reviewed as a historical control group (N = 40). The historical cohort was compared to a prospectively collected group of patients who were treated according to the pathway (N = 40). Patients: Healthy, nonsyndromic infants undergoing primary cleft palate repair at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Interventions: A novel, standardized pathway was created through an iterative process, combining literature review with expert opinion and discussions with institutional stakeholders. The pathway integrated multimodal analgesia throughout the perioperative course and included intraoperative bilateral maxillary nerve blocks. Perioperative protocols for preoperative fasting, case timing, antiemetics, intravenous fluid management, and postoperative diet advancement were standardized. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes include: (1) length of hospital stay, (2) cumulative opioid consumption, (3) oral intake postoperatively. Results: Patients treated according to the pathway had shorter mean length of stay (31 vs 57 hours, P < .001), decreased cumulative morphine consumption (77 vs 727 μg/kg, P < .001), shorter time to initiate oral intake (9.3 vs 22 hours, P = .01), and greater volume of oral intake in first 24 hours postoperatively (379 vs 171 mL, P < .001). There were no differences in total anesthesia time, total surgical time, or complication rates between the control and treatment groups. Conclusions: Implementation of a standardized perioperative clinical care pathway for primary cleft palate repair is safe, feasible, and associated with reduced length of stay, reduced opioid consumption, and improved oral intake postoperatively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document