Directional coronary atherectomy via Amplatz left guiding catheter

Author(s):  
Satoshi Watanabe ◽  
Atsunori Okamura ◽  
Mutsumi Iwamoto ◽  
Hiroyuki Nagai ◽  
Akinori Sumiyoshi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Y. Guérin ◽  
E. Garcia-Cantu ◽  
X. Favereau ◽  
F. Funck ◽  
M. Toussaint ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Azriel Osherov ◽  
Jamal Jafari ◽  
Chaim Yosefy ◽  
Enrique Gallego‐Colon

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J.C Guo ◽  
W.G.Z Wang ◽  
L.Z.J Liu ◽  
L.H.D Li ◽  
N.D Niu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective There is limited literature on procedure of primary PCI in catheterization laboratory. This study was designed to assess the impact of electrocardiogram-guided immediate intervention on culprit lesion with a single guiding catheter in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients on door-to-balloon (D2B) time and clinical outcomes. Methods In this prospective, randomized single center study, 560 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI from February 2017 to July 2019 were randomized into two groups. In single catheter group, a single guiding catheter (MAC3.5 or JL 3.5 guiding catheter) was used to perform angiogram and PCI of culprit vessel, followed by contralateral angiography (n=280). In contral group, 280 patients underwent primary PCI after complete diagnostic angiography. The primary evaluation was D2B time and second endpoint include catheterization laboratory-to-balloon (C2B) time, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03272451. Results Baseline characteristics were not different between the two groups. The median D2B time (54.83 [IQR 40.00–68.0] min versus 58.32 [IQR 44.12–78.40] min, P=0.007), C2B time (16.91 [IQR 13.88–21.42] min versus 23.80 [IQR 18.92–28.52] min, P<0.001), total procedural time (45.17 [34.06–59.48] min versus 48.51 [37.04–64.60] min, P=0.012) and fluoroscopy time (9.70 [6.50–14.15] min versus 11.26 [8.01–14.27] min, P=0.025)were significantly shorter in single catheter group Compared with control group. The proportion of patients achieving D2B time within 60 minutes increased significantly in the single catheter group (61.79% vs. 52.14%, P=0.021). The rate of radial perforation was significantly reduced in single catheter group (0.71% vs. 3.21%, P=0.033). The total number of catheters was significantly less in single catheter group (1.18±0.54 vs. 2.23±0.60, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the MACE at 30 days (2.5% vs. 4.64%, P=0.172) between the 2 groups. Conclusion ECG-guided immediate intervention on culprit lesion with a single guiding catheter in STEMI patients can reduce D2B time, C2B time, procedural time and fluoroscopy time. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Miyajima ◽  
T Urushida ◽  
K Ito ◽  
F Kin ◽  
A Okazaki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Right ventricular (RV) septal pacing is often selected to preserve a more physiologic ventricular activation. But the pacing leads are not always located in true septal wall, rather in hinge or free wall in some cases with the conventional stylet-guided lead implantation. In recent years, new guiding catheter systems has attracted attention as a solution to that problem. Objective The aim of this study is to investigate that true ventricular sepal pacing can be achieved by use of the new guiding catheter system for pacing lead. Methods We enrolled 198 patients who underwent RV septal lead implantation and computed tomography (CT) after pacemaker implantation. 16 cases were used delivery catheter (Delivery), and 182 cases were used stylet for targeting ventricular septum (Conventional). We analyzed the lead locations with CT, and evaluated capture thresholds, R-wave amplitudes, lead impedances and 12-lead electrocardiogram findings one month after implantation. Results All cases of delivery catheter group had true septal lead positions (Delivery; 100% vs Conventional; 44%, p<0.01). Capture thresholds and lead impedances had not significant differences between between two groups (0.65±0.15V vs 0.60±0.15V, p=0.21, 570±95Ω vs 595±107Ω, p=0.39, respectively). R-wave amplitudes were significantly higher in delivery catheter group (13.0±4.8mV vs 10±4.6mV, p<0.01). Paced QRS durations were shorter in delivery catheter group (128±16ms vs 150±21ms, p<0.01). Conclusions The delivery catheter system designated for pacing lead can contribute to select the true ventricular septal sites and to attain the more physiologic ventricular activation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


1995 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 841-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeru Nakamura ◽  
Donald J. Mahon ◽  
Cyril Y. Leung ◽  
Bavani Maheswaran ◽  
Dan E. Gutfinger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document