scholarly journals Movement aftereffect of bi-vectorial transparent motion

1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frans A.J. Verstraten ◽  
R. Eric Fredericksen ◽  
Wim A. Van De Grind
Perception ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
J E W Mayhew

A microtextured surface such as a homogeneously illuminated tracing-paper screen provides an excellent test surface for the movement aftereffect. When it is moved against the aftereffect at the appropriate velocity, a null occurs and the screen appears stationary. However, if patterned illumination is superimposed on the homogeneous field, the nulling breaks down. The pattern appears to move in one direction, driven by the aftereffect, and the screen can be clearly seen moving in the opposite direction. This breakdown begins to occur at luminances just above threshold for the detection of the pattern. The implication is that two populations of motion detectors are involved. Evidence in support of this postulate is presented.


2006 ◽  
Vol 1072 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valia Rodríguez ◽  
Mitchell Valdés-Sosa

Perception ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1233-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Thompson ◽  
Justin Wright

Wohlgemuth, having measured the duration of the motion aftereffect (MAE), instructed subjects to close their eyes immediately after adaptation for a period of time longer than the MAE. Upon opening their eyes the subjects reported a residual effect, albeit somewhat shorter than the original effect. Thus the decay of the aftereffect appeared to have been retarded by the period of darkness. This effect is known as ‘storage’ and poses a problem for any model of the MAE based on the fatiguing of direction-selective units in the visual pathway. A reexamination is made of storage of the MAE, again concentrating on the intervening stimulation between movement adaptation and aftereffect test. The results suggest that the nature of the intervening pattern between adaptation and test conditions is remarkably unimportant. A total of 11 different storage patterns were examined after adaptation to high-contrast drifting horizontal sinewave gratings. For 10 of these patterns large and robust storage effects were found. The exception occurred when the spatial pattern of the storage stimulus was identical to the adaptation and test stimuli. It is proposed that storage cannot be understood in terms of a simple fatigue model of the MAE and that one component of the effect may share similarities with contingent aftereffects.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Zokaei ◽  
N. Gorgoraptis ◽  
B. Bahrami ◽  
P. M. Bays ◽  
M. Husain

Cognition ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. B13-B23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell Valdes-Sosa ◽  
Ariadna Cobo ◽  
Tupac Pinilla

1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (18) ◽  
pp. 2805-2813 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICHARD J.A van WEZEL ◽  
MARTIN J.M LANKHEET ◽  
FRANS A.J VERSTRATEN ◽  
ATHANASIUS F.M MARÉE ◽  
WIM A van de GRIND

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 1745-1752 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R Webster ◽  
Joseph T Panthradil ◽  
Damian M Conway

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document