National parks — fit to face the future?

1990 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-358
Author(s):  
Roger Bush
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
pp. 73-104
Author(s):  
Alan D. Roe

During the 1970s in the USSR, several Soviet republics established national parks. While the Soviet Council of Ministers had to pass a law giving national parks union status before the RSFSR could establish national parks, numerous park projects were conceived throughout Russia during this era. The attention that the Soviet government gave to environmental protection fueled their hopes. At the same time, Russian environmentalists became increasingly frustrated by the slow push toward establishing a law giving national parks union status as they discussed the future form that Russia’s parks would take. Passed by the USSR Council of Ministers in 1981, the law recognizing national parks left many long-debated issues unresolved and laid the groundwork for conflicts between Russia’s national parks and local populations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 243 ◽  
pp. 88-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Clark ◽  
Emily J. Wilkins ◽  
Dani T. Dagan ◽  
Robert Powell ◽  
Ryan L. Sharp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Nature ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 205 (4967) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Turner

Abstract A national park provides recreational opportunities and also provides a pure public good. This paper presents an intergenerational model in which a club good and a pure public good are provided jointly. The focus is on optimality conditions for services provided by park managers. At the margin, the cost of providing the services should be balanced by the benefits of services. Services can directly enhance visitor enjoyment, both immediately and in the future; they can also affect congestion currently and in the future; they can affect the quality of park resources; and they can affect the pure public good provision. The framework developed in this paper suggests what information should be used by the National Park Service when deciding on the level and kind of services to provide.


1979 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Polunin ◽  
Harold K. Eidsvik

The central role of ecology in park planning and management is now so well recognized that the establishment of park programmes without ecological advice seems unthinkable. Yet attempts to link ecological principles and planning principles are still fraught with difficulty. Communications between interdisciplinary teams are complex.The Authors of this paper illustrate how the principles of ecology and the practices of park management are interconnected and interdependent. The need for resource inventories as a foundation of park management is explored and emphasized as essential, as is the need for constant monitoring to ensure that conservation goals are attained. Underlying the article are basic convictions that dynamic ecosystems require dynamic management, and that management in the future will be required increasingly to attain specific conservation objectives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document