Applicant Screening and Employee Socialization

Author(s):  
Philip P. Purpura
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdifatah A. Ali ◽  
Mark G. Ehrhart ◽  
Lindsay E. Palmer ◽  
Susan K. Drobka ◽  
Karen Holcombe Ehrhart ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 447-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Villwock ◽  
Chelsea S. Hamill ◽  
Keith A. Sale ◽  
Kevin J. Sykes
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie C. Payne ◽  
Satoris S. Culbertson ◽  
Wendy R. Boswell ◽  
Eric J. Barger

ILR Review ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Saltzman

The author examines efforts by managers of a Japanese-owned auto parts plant to avoid hiring union sympathizers in 1993–94. Data from confidential questionnaires in which job applicants stated whether they would vote for union representation in their current or most recent job were matched with outcome data provided by management. Pro-union applicants were much more likely than other applicants to withdraw their applications or quit shortly after being hired. The author finds only weak evidence, however, that management overtly favored antiunion job applicants in making job offers.


Author(s):  
Robert O. Besco

Recent airline accidents have been attributed to pilot errors of junior pilots whose professional flying experience, at the time of hiring, did not measure up to the standards of the hiring airline. How these pilots slipped through the screening process of conscientious and well intentioned personnel departments is a major question. Several tested and proven methods of applicant screening are suggested to be used in the hiring process for new pilots.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document