Plant Resistance to Viruses: Engineered Resistance

Author(s):  
Marc Fuchs
2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 789-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. M. Soosaar ◽  
Tessa M. Burch-Smith ◽  
Savithramma P. Dinesh-Kumar

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Ghidiu ◽  
David S. Douches ◽  
Kimberly J. Felcher ◽  
Joseph J. Coombs

The Colorado potato beetle,Leptinotarsa decemlineata(Say) Order Coleoptera and the potato leafhopper,Empoasca fabae(Harris) Order Homoptera, are the major insect pests of potato in eastern North America. In two years of field trials, we compared the effectiveness of three pest management options for the control of Colorado potato beetle and potato leafhopper: natural host plant resistance (glandular trichomes), engineered resistance (Bacillus thuringiensis[Bt] Berlinercry3Agene) and a susceptible potato cultivar (Superior) with an at-planting application of the insecticide thiamethoxam. Similar and acceptable control of the Colorado potato beetle larvae was obtained with theBt-cry3Alines and the thiamethoxam treated “Superior” variety. The glandular trichome cultivar had significantly less Colorado potato beetle damage than did the untreated “Superior” in 2004, although damage was significantly greater than in theBt-cry3Alines and the insecticide-treated potatoes for both years, and was the only treatment that consistently had very little potato leafhopper damage. These data demonstrate that although each type of host plant resistance mechanism (Bt-cry3Aor glandular trichomes) was as effective as the chemical control against one of the insects, neither provides adequate resistance to both Colorado potato beetle and potato leaf hopper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document