Complication of Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Stenosis

Author(s):  
Fucheng Tian ◽  
Mithun G. Sattur ◽  
Devi P. Patra ◽  
Matthew E. Welz ◽  
Chandan Krishna ◽  
...  
Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. S210-S218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Ecker ◽  
Elad I. Levy ◽  
Eric Sauvageau ◽  
Ricardo A. Hanel ◽  
L Nelson Hopkins

Abstract MEDICALLY REFRACTORY, SYMPTOMATIC intracranial atherosclerotic disease has a poor prognosis. Based on the results of the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease study, the risk of ipsilateral stroke at 1.8 years is between 13 and 14% in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Synergistic advances in intracranial angioplasty and stenting, modern neuroimaging techniques, and periprocedural and postprocedural antithrombotic regimens are creating new models for the diagnosis and successful endovascular treatment of intracranial stenosis. In this article, the most recent clinical developments and concepts for the diagnosis and endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease are discussed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Natarajan ◽  
Y. Karmon ◽  
R. G. Tawk ◽  
E. F. Hauck ◽  
L. N. Hopkins ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osman Kozak ◽  
Nauman Tariq ◽  
M. Fareed K. Suri ◽  
Robert A. Taylor ◽  
Adnan I. Qureshi

Abstract BACKGROUND: Intracranial angioplasty with or without stent placement has been performed to treat patients with recurrent cerebral ischemic events despite best medical therapy or those with high-grade stenosis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate early recurrent stroke/transient ischemic attack rates in a cohort of patients with symptomatic >50% intracranial stenosis in whom intracranial angioplasty and stent placement was initially deferred. METHODS: All patients presenting to 2 academic hospitals with symptomatic intracranial disease between 2006 and 2008 who underwent catheter angiography were identified. Patients with complete intracranial occlusion or stenosis less than 50% stenosis were excluded (n = 14). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients met the study criteria. Sixteen (52%) patients were on antiplatelet medications at the time of the initial event, and 2 patients were also on anticoagulant medications. Six patients (19%) underwent intracranial angioplasty and/or stent placement with their initial diagnostic angiogram. Twenty-five patients (81%) had endovascular treatment deferred for best medical treatment in the interim period. Among the 25 patients who were kept on medical management, 14 (56%) were readmitted with recurrent ischemic events in the distribution of the target artery within a median of 28 days (range, 1-243 days). Recurrent events occurred within 1 week in 8 (57%) patients, between 7 days and 1 month in 4 (29%) patients, 1 to 3 months in 1 (7%) patient, and after 3 months in 1 (7%) patient. Recurrent ischemic events were observed in all 5 patients with basilar artery stenosis and in 13 of 17 patients with severity of stenosis ≥70%. CONCLUSION: A high rate of recurrent ischemic events was observed among patients in whom endovascular treatment was deferred, particularly those with basilar artery stenosis and those with high-grade stenosis. This information would be beneficial in decision making for timing of the endovascular treatment among patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dulce Neutel ◽  
Luísa Biscoito ◽  
Jorge Campos ◽  
Teresa Pinho e Melo ◽  
Luísa Albuquerque

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hengwei Jin ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Xiangyu Meng ◽  
Youxiang Li ◽  
Zhongrong Miao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To evaluate the safety of endovascular therapy for concomitant unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) and cerebral vascular stenosis. Methods Patients between January to August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed at our institution. Concomitant UIA and cerebral vascular stenosis patients underwent endovascular treatment were included. The demographics and clinical information were collected. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to lesions that was treated (aneurysm, stenosis, both lesions in a single session or in separated sessions). Patients were divided into another 2 groups based on locations of aneurysm and stenosis (ipsilateral and non-ipsilateral). The demographics and clinical data were compared among groups. Results A total of 105 (4.9%) cases have concomitant UIA and cerebral vascular stenosis. Eighty-one patients underwent endovascular treatment for the stenosis(n=18), aneurysm(n=41) or both lesions (one session=10; separated sessions n=12). Seven (8.6%) patients experienced procedural related complications, including 1 (1.2%) hemorrhagic and 6 (7.4%) ischemic types. In terms of procedures, 4 (6.3%) complications is related with UIA embolization, 2(5.0%) related with intracranial stenosis angioplasty. Complication rate of patients underwent intracranial angioplasty and aneurysm embolization simultaneously is much higher (20%) than that of the other groups (5.6%-8.3%). Patients with ipsilateral lesions also had higher complication rate (11.1%) than non-ipsilateral patients (6.7%). Follow-up (74 patients, mean=6.5months) result showed good clinical outcome in 70 (94.6%) patients. Conclusions Simultaneous treatment for concomitant UIA and extracranial stenosis may not pose additional risks. Ipsilateral lesions and single session procedure for intracranial stenosis and UIA are potential risk factors for periprocedural complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document