scholarly journals The Exeter Short Revision Stem for Cement-in-Cement Femoral Revision: A Five to Twelve Year Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. S297-S301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam B. Woodbridge ◽  
Matthew J. Hubble ◽  
Sarah L. Whitehouse ◽  
Matthew J. Wilson ◽  
Jonathan R. Howell ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-108
Author(s):  
T. Mumme ◽  
R. Müller-Rath ◽  
S. Andereya ◽  
D. C. Wirtz

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Falko Herold ◽  
Henk Eijer

We report about a fracture of a modular, uncemented femoral revision stem (Zimmer, Revitan®) due to a not previously described intraoperative technical problem. During implantation, a small ring, part of the proximal part of the trial stem, was left on the distal part of the definite stem. Following this, the top screwcap of the proximal part of the definite stem could not be tightened properly. However, the stem was thought to be stable, and the situation left. Two and a half years later, the proximal part of the stem fractured and the situation became unstable. It is very useful to know about this ring and that it should always be removed, otherwise, there is possibility that it may be left on the definite distal part of the stem with the possibility of a later fracture.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher E. Pelt ◽  
Marissa L. Stagg ◽  
Christin Van Dine ◽  
Mike B. Anderson ◽  
Christopher L. Peters ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 294-298
Author(s):  
Ritesh R. Shah ◽  
Nancy E. Cipparrone ◽  
Frank W. Parilla ◽  
Matthew G. Robinson ◽  
Alexander C. Gordon ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Dong Han ◽  
Ick Whan Yang ◽  
Jin Park

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document