scholarly journals Editorial Commentary: Beware the Radial Nerve: More Elbow Arthroscopy Portals, More Options

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1986-1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry D. Field
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596711881723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sutee Thaveepunsan ◽  
Maegan N. Shields ◽  
Shawn W. O’Driscoll

Background: Safe and effective portal placement is crucial for successful elbow arthroscopy. Various techniques for anterolateral portal placement in elbow arthroscopy have been described, yet radial nerve injuries are commonly reported. Purpose: To report on the technique and safety of anterolateral portal placement by the needle-and-knife method and its clinical applications. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was completed of patients who underwent an arthroscopic procedure in the anterior compartment of the elbow and anterolateral portal placement. Patients were evaluated immediately postoperatively and at subsequent visits and were monitored for signs of radial nerve injury. Results: A total of 460 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 309 (67%) underwent the needle-and-knife technique. There was 1 case (0.3%) of temporary radial nerve palsy. For the remaining 151 patients who underwent anterolateral portal placement by other techniques, there were 2 cases of temporary radial nerve palsy (1.3%). There were no cases of the needle-and-knife technique being unsuccessful or abandoned in lieu of a different technique. Use of the needle-and-knife technique increased over time with experience and practice. Initially, contraindications to this technique included impaired view of the lateral side of the anterior compartment of the elbow caused by severe intra-articular scar (65%), extensive synovitis (10%), or large osteophytes or loose bodies (10%). For the remaining patients (15%) who did not have portals placed via the needle-and-knife technique, alternate techniques were used for teaching purposes. Conclusion: The needle-and-knife technique is reproducible and easy to perform by a clinician instructed in its use and trained in elbow arthroscopy. Its main advantage is that it permits the surgeon to safely slide the knife along the lateral supracondylar ridge, releasing the scarred capsule and thereby increasing the available space in which to work. Enlarging the working space inside scarred and contracted elbows cannot be accomplished by distending the capsule.


Author(s):  
Stephen G Thon ◽  
Michael J O’Brien ◽  
Lane Rush ◽  
Peter Gold ◽  
Felix Henry Savoie III

ImportanceProper portal placement is imperative for a successful outcome in elbow arthroscopy. Discrepancies in the location of the placement of the anterolateral portal, with variable safety margins in regard to the radial nerve, exist in the current cadaveric literature.ObjectiveTo systematically review and compare the placement of the anterolateral portal in elbow arthroscopy with regard to the radial nerve.Evidence reviewA systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines utilising the PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases. Criteria included any original cadaveric study discussing the placement of the anterolateral portal in relation to the radial nerve. No restrictions were placed on publication date or language.FindingsThirteen studies met final inclusion criteria as an original cadaveric work with regard to the location of the anterolateral portal and its relation to the radial nerve. Overall, nine distinct definitions of the anterolateral portal were identified in the literature, each with variable safety margins.Conclusions and relevanceThere is really no consistency in the literature describing the locations of the lateral portals of the elbow. We have grouped those definitions into three categories: the distal, the direct and the proximal portals based on the location relative to the lateral epicondyle. Portal locations in the direct and proximal categories were consistently found to have an increased safety margin in reference to the radial nerve when compared with those of the distal anterolateral portal. Joint distention and positioning of the elbow in 90° of flexion provides an increase in safety margin. The effects of these techniques are additive.Level of evidenceLevel IV—Systematic Review of Cadaver studies


1987 ◽  
Vol &NA; (215) ◽  
pp. 130???131 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARK A. THOMAS ◽  
AVITAL FAST ◽  
DANIEL SHAPIRO

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 494-494
Author(s):  
E. Ann Gormley
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 470-470
Author(s):  
Angela B. Smith
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. William Woods
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document