Aneurysmal Dilatation of the Contegra Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit After Reconstruction of the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract

2007 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 682-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Maria Delmo-Walter ◽  
Vladimir Alexi-Meskishvili ◽  
Hashim Abdul-Khaliq ◽  
Rudolf Meyer ◽  
Roland Hetzer
2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 618-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitendu H. Dave ◽  
Alexander Kadner ◽  
Felix Berger ◽  
Burkhardt Seifert ◽  
Ali Dodge-Khatami ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1097-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamer Yoldaş ◽  
Utku A. Örün ◽  
Sercan Tak

AbstractValved bovine jugular vein conduit is considered a suitable choice for paediatric population with congenital heart defect requiring right ventricle to main pulmonary artery connection. However, complications related to the use of this device have been reported, with conduit failure occurring mainly as a consequence of stenosis, conduit thrombosis, and valve regurgitation. We present a case of aneurysmal conduit failure of a valved bovine jugular vein conduit used to reconstruct the right ventricular outflow tract.


2003 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 490-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Younes Boudjemline ◽  
Damien Bonnet ◽  
Tony Abdel Massih ◽  
Gabriella Agnoletti ◽  
Franck Iserin ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Kuroczynski ◽  
C Kampmann ◽  
C Martin ◽  
M Heinemann ◽  
D Pruefer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parth M. Patel ◽  
Corinne Tan ◽  
Nayan Srivastava ◽  
Jeremy L. Herrmann ◽  
Mark D. Rodefeld ◽  
...  

Background: Since 1999, we have used the bovine jugular vein conduit for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in infants and children. Herein, we review their mid- to long-term outcomes. Methods: Between 1999 and 2016, 315 bovine jugular vein conduits were implanted in 276 patients. Patients were grouped by age at bovine jugular vein conduit implant: group 1: 0 to 1 years (N = 65), group 2: one to ten years (N = 132), and group 3: older than ten years (N = 118). For survival and hemodynamic analysis, additional group stratification was done based on conduit size. Group small: 12 and 14 mm (N = 75), group medium: 16 and 18 mm (N = 84), and group large: 20 and 22 mm (N = 156). Results: Mean follow-up for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 4.0, 4.9, and 5.9 years, respectively. Early mortality was 9%, 0%, and 1% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively ( P < .001). Late mortality was 5%, 2%, and 2% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively ( P = .337). Group 1 had the lowest ten-year freedom from conduit failure at 13%, versus 53% and 69% for groups 2 and 3, respectively ( P < .001). A total of 21 (6.6%) patients developed endocarditis, 11 (3.5%) patients required reoperation, and 10 (3.2%) patients required antibiotic therapy alone. Conclusions: The bovine jugular vein conduit is a useful option for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction given its easy implantability and acceptable midterm durability.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Hirai ◽  
K Baba ◽  
T Goto ◽  
D Ousaka ◽  
H Oh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Various types of conduits are available for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction (RVOTR). The bovine jugular vein graft (BJVG) and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft (ePTFEG) have been descrived as an alternative to the homograft for RVOTR. Purpose- This study summarized the results to evaluate the single-center operation of RVOTR using BJVG and ePTFEG. Methods The valve functions of 27 patients under 20 years old who underwent primary RVOTR with BJVG and 26 patients with ePTFEG at our university hospital between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively investigated. The valve conditions were assessed using echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Results The median age at the time of operation was 1.8 years old (range, 6 days to 7.8 years old) with BJVG and 2.2 years old (range, 8 months to 9.1 years old) with ePTFEG. The median follow-up time was 3.4 years (range, 2 months to 5.2 years) with BJVG and 2.1 years (range, 1 month to 5.1 years) with ePTFEG. The peak RVOT gradient of BJVG was lower than ePTFEG (10.6±7.7 mmHg versus 18.1±16.2 mmHg, P=0.035). There were no differences in branch pulmonary stenosis defined as peak gradient up to 36mmHg (40.7% versus 50.0%, P=0.50) and pulmonary regurgitation graded worse than moderate (18.5% versus 11.5%, P=0.48) with BJVG and ePTFEG, respectively. Aneurysmal dilatation of the conduit was seen 22.2% with BJVG but none of patients with ePTFEG (P=0.01). All of patients with aneurysmal dilated BJVG had branch pulmonary stenosis. There were no differences in catheter intervention for branch pulmonary stenosis (22.2% versus 30.8%, P=0.48) and conduit replacement (11.1% versus 7.7%, log rank P=0.67) with BJVG and ePTFEG, respectively. There were no deaths during the fllow-up period in both groups. Conclusions The outcomes of RVOTR with BJVG and ePTFEG were clinically satisfactory. Aneurysmal dilatation was seen with BJVG and branch pulmonary stenosis was the risk factor for aneurysmal dilatation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document