scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Through a Right Anterior Thoracotomy: How I Teach It

2019 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh K. Ramchandani ◽  
Moritz C. Wyler von Ballmoos ◽  
Michael J. Reardon
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Van Praet ◽  
Antonia van Kampen ◽  
Markus Kofler ◽  
Gregor Richter ◽  
Simon Suendermann ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 2341-2346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel M. Praet ◽  
Antonia Kampen ◽  
Markus Kofler ◽  
Gregor Richter ◽  
Simon H. Sündermann ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 1016-1017
Author(s):  
Marco Di Eusanio ◽  
Mariano Cefarelli ◽  
Paolo Berretta ◽  
Filippo Capestro

Abstract Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis are currently treated with 2 different interventional techniques: surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Both have strengths and limitations. On the one hand, TAVI represents a valuable option in high- and intermediate-risk patients and is commonly preferred over surgical aortic valve replacement in subjects with porcelain or severely calcified aorta, on the other, the lack of data on valve durability raises concerns on its use in young, low-risk patients. We present herein the case of a low-risk 71-year-old patient with a severely calcified ascending aorta. We successfully combined our minimally invasive surgical approach with the use of a percutaneous cerebral protection system commonly employed during TAVI procedures. We believe that cardiac surgeons could adopt transcatheter technology to improve operative results.


Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. s10-s15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan Jahangiri ◽  
Azhar Hussain ◽  
Enoch Akowuah

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) is defined as a surgical aortic valve replacement which involves smaller chest incisions as opposed to full sternotomy. It is performed using cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac arrest. It benefits from potential advantages of a less invasive procedure. To date, over 14 000 MIAVR have been reported in the literature. Due to heterogeneity of the studies, different surgical techniques and mainly the non-randomised nature of these studies comparing MIAVR with conventional aortic valve replacement, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. The two main techniques of MIAVR are mini-sternotomy and right anterior mini-thoracotomy. Both techniques with other less common forms of MIAVR will be discussed in this review. The advantages, disadvantages and surgical pitfalls will be discussed. Some of the advantages include shorter intensive care and hospital stay, reduced perioperative blood loss, less pain, improved respiratory function and cosmesis. The possible disadvantage of longer bypass and cross-clamp times may be counter balanced by the recent sutureless and rapid deployment valves. Despite some of the benefits, MIAVR has not been adopted by a significant proportion of the surgeons possibly related to the learning curve and requirements for re-training. As MIAVR becomes more common, randomised trials comparing this technique with transcatheter aortic valve implantation is warranted. In addition, assessing quality of life including return to work and functional capacity is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document