Very long-term outcome of Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass

Author(s):  
Giorgio Mastroiacovo ◽  
Sabrina Manganiello ◽  
Sergio Pirola ◽  
Calogero Tedesco ◽  
Laura Cavallotti ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1975-1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachito Fukuda ◽  
Ikutarou Kigawa ◽  
Takeshi Miyairi ◽  
Hideki Shimizu ◽  
Takahiro Nishi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kursad Oz ◽  
Ünal Aydın ◽  
Mugisha Kyaruzi ◽  
Zeynep Karaman ◽  
Onur Selçuk Göksel ◽  
...  

Background: Optimal surgical approach for patients with hemodynamically significant carotid and coronary disease remains controversial. We analyzed our 5-year experience and compared early and long-term outcome following staged and combined carotid and coronary artery bypass. Methods: 312 consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass between 2008 and 2013 were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were scheduled for a staged (carotid endarterectomy followed by coronary artery bypass within 1 week) procedure (Group S) unless they were unstable in terms of cardiac status (were deemed to a combined procedure; Group C). All patient data including demographics, risk factors, immediate perioperative events, 30-day, and long-term outcome were prospectively recorded and then analyzed. Groups S and C were compared for pre- and perioperative data as well as immediate, 30-day, and long-term survival. A P value less than .05 was considered significant. Survival analysis was made using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.Results: Group S included 204 patients and Group C included 108 patients. Preoperative demographics and clinical data were similar in the two groups except that preoperative cerebrovascular events were more common in Group C (31.7% versus 22.22%, P = .036) and bilateral carotid disease was more common in Group S. The EuroSCORE was higher in Group C (2.91 versus 2.65, P = .013). Carotid surgery techniques were similar; intraluminal shunting was more frequent in group C than group S (33.33% versus 9.88%, P = .001). Additional cardiac procedures in addition to coronary surgery was predominant in Group C. 30-day neurological adverse event rates, ICU, and hospital stay were significantly higher in Group C. The 30-day mortality was also sigficantly higher in Group C (1.96% versus 4.62%, P = .001). Conclusion: Staged and combined surgical approaches yield comparable outcomes. A staged approach may provide a more favorable neurological outcome with significantly reduced need for intraluminal shunting. Long-term outcome is, however, similar.


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hera Johannesdottir ◽  
Linda O. Arnadottir ◽  
Jonas A. Adalsteinsson ◽  
Tomas A. Axelsson ◽  
Martin I. Sigurdsson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document