Aortic Annular Enlargement Through the Lens of Valve-in-Valve

Author(s):  
J. Hunter Mehaffey
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Endlich ◽  
F Mellert ◽  
J Breuer ◽  
U Herberg ◽  
I Heinze ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Seiffert ◽  
L Conradi ◽  
S Baldus ◽  
J Schirmer ◽  
M Knap ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Alexiou ◽  
M Wilbring ◽  
SM Tugtekin ◽  
K Matschke ◽  
G Simonis ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
R.-U. Kühnel ◽  
M. Hartrumpf ◽  
M. Erb ◽  
J. Rashvand ◽  
J. Albes

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
A. B. Voevodin ◽  
A. A. Allenov ◽  
V. V. Bazylev

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Marco Angelillis

Transcatheter valve in valve (ViV) implantation actually represents a valid alternative to surgical reinterventions in patients with previous surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). In patients less than 80 years old, it is crucial to correctly position the new valve leaving a feasible and easy access to coronary ostia, both for future percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than for a future possible TAVinTAV procedure. We report a 71 year old man with prior AVR presented with structural valve deterioration (SVD) leading to severe aortic stenosis. In order to guarantee comfortable coronary access we aligned, the commissures of the new percutaneous valve with the ones of the surgical bioprothesis by reconstructing the headframes of the surgical bioprosthesis with computer tomography (CT) and fluoro-CT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document