Comparison of Aortobifemoral Bypass to Aortoiliac Stenting with Bifurcation Reconstruction for TASC II D Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Smith ◽  
Jocelyn M. Beach ◽  
Siddhartha Dash ◽  
Jarrad Rowse ◽  
Frederico E. Parodi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

scholarly journals Prior Endovascular Interventions Are Associated With Higher Complication and Lower Patency Rates of Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. e187-e188
Author(s):  
Sina Asaadi ◽  
Othman M. Abdul-Malak ◽  
Patrick Cherfan ◽  
Marissa Jarosinski ◽  
Jason K. Wagner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease ◽  
Endovascular Interventions

Aortoiliac Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark K. Eskandari ◽  
Michael J Nooromid
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease ◽  
Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortoiliac Reconstruction

This review outlines the preoperative evaluation, clinical decision making, and surgical treatment options for patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. It also details the open surgical techniques for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease and reviews endovascular treatment options. The discussion of treatment options includes the potential complications and expected outcomes, as well as steps that can be taken to optimize surgical results. Key words: aortobifemoral bypass, aortoiliac reconstruction, atherosclerotic occlusive disease, endovascular reconstruction, femoral endarterectomy, iliac angioplasty, iliac stenting, peripheral vascular disease 

Effect of Obesity on Patient Outcomes after Aortobifemoral Bypass in the Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. e67
Author(s):  
Luigi Pascarella ◽  
Paula D. Strassle ◽  
Corey A. Kalbaugh ◽  
Katharine L. McGinigle ◽  
Mark A. Farber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Aortoiliac Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark K. Eskandari ◽  
Michael J Nooromid
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease ◽  
Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortoiliac Reconstruction

This review outlines the preoperative evaluation, clinical decision making, and surgical treatment options for patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. It also details the open surgical techniques for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease and reviews endovascular treatment options. The discussion of treatment options includes the potential complications and expected outcomes, as well as steps that can be taken to optimize surgical results. Key words: aortobifemoral bypass, aortoiliac reconstruction, atherosclerotic occlusive disease, endovascular reconstruction, femoral endarterectomy, iliac angioplasty, iliac stenting, peripheral vascular disease 

scholarly journals Association between statin use and perioperative mortality after aortobifemoral bypass in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-515
Author(s):  
Ahmed H. Abdelkarim ◽  
Hanaa Dakour-Aridi ◽  
Merve Gurakar ◽  
Besma Nejim ◽  
Satinderjit Locham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Perioperative Mortality ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease ◽  
Statin Use

Descending Thoracic Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

2001 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-100
Author(s):  
Akio Ihaya ◽  
Yukio Chiba ◽  
Tetsuya Kimura ◽  
Koichi Morioka ◽  
Takahiko Uesaka
Keyword(s):  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Endovascular Approach Versus Aortobifemoral Bypass Grafting: Outcomes in Extensive Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Rocha-Neves ◽  
André Ferreira ◽  
Joel Sousa ◽  
António Pereira-Neves ◽  
José Vidoedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Surgery ◽  
Common Femoral Artery ◽  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease ◽  
Type D ◽  
Procedure Cost ◽  
History Of ◽  
Endovascular Approach ◽  
Cost Efficient

Objective: Compare technical, clinical, and economic outcomes between endovascular and open approaches in patients with type D aortoiliac occlusive disease according to the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus. Methods: Patients undergoing revascularization for type D aortoiliac lesions, either endovascular or open surgery approach, from 2 Portuguese institutions between January 2011 and October 2017 were included. The surgical technique was left to the surgeon discretion. Patients with common femoral artery affection, both obstructive and aneurysmatic, were excluded. Results: Twenty-seven patients underwent aortobifemoral bypass and 32 patients were submitted to endovascular repair. The patients undergoing endovascular procedure were more likely to present with chronic heart failure ( P = .001) and chronic kidney disease ( P = .022) and less likely to have a history of smoking ( P = .05). The mean follow-up period was 67.84 (95% confidence interval = 61.85-73.83) months. The open surgery approach resulted in a higher technical success ( P = .001); however, limb salvage and patency rates were not different between groups. Endovascular approach was associated with a shorter length-of-stay, both inpatient (6 vs 9 days; P = .041) and patients admitted in the intensive care unit (0 vs 3.81 days; P = .001) as well as lower hospital expenses (US$9281 vs US$23 038; P = .001) with a similar procedure cost (US$2316 vs US$1173; P = .6). No differences were found in the postsurgical quality of life. Conclusion: Endovascular approach is, at least, clinically equivalent to open surgery approach and is more cost-efficient. The “endovascular-first” approach should be considered for type D occlusive aortoiliac lesions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document