Disclosure of the Resident Role in the Interventional Radiology Suite: How Do Interventional Radiologists Balance Patient Care and Resident Education?

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Zener ◽  
Daniele Wiseman

Purpose The study sought to assess how academic interventional radiologists determine and disclose to patients the intraprocedural role of radiology residents in the interventional radiology (IR) suite. Methods A qualitative study consisting of in-person interviews with 9 academic interventional radiologists from 3 hospitals was conducted. Interviews were transcribed, and underwent modified thematic analysis. Results Seven themes emerged. 1) Interventional radiologists permit residents to perform increasingly complex procedures with graded responsibility. While observed technical ability is important in determining the extent of resident participation, possessing good judgement and knowing personal limitations are paramount. 2) Interventional radiologists do not explicitly inform patients in detail about residents' intraprocedural role, as trainee involvement is viewed as implicit at academic institutions. 3) While patients are advised of resident participation in IR procedures, detailed disclosure of their role is viewed as potentially detrimental to both patient well-being and trainee education. 4) Interventional radiologists believe that patients might be less likely to refuse resident involvement if they meet them prior to procedures. 5) While it is rare that patients refuse resident participation in their care, interventional radiologists' duty to respect patient autonomy supersedes their obligation to resident education. 6) Interventional radiologists are responsible for any intraprocedural, trainee-related complication. 7) Trainees should be present when complications are disclosed to patients. Conclusion Interventional radiologists recognize the confidence placed in them, and they do not inform patients in detail about residents' role in IR procedures. Respecting patient autonomy is paramount, and while rare, obeying patients' wishes can potentially be at the expense of resident education.

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1703-1707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond H. Thornton ◽  
Lawrence T. Dauer ◽  
Joaquin P. Altamirano ◽  
Keith J. Alvarado ◽  
Jean St. Germain ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1347
Author(s):  
Bedros Taslakian ◽  
Ross Ingber ◽  
Eric Aaltonen ◽  
Jeremy Horn ◽  
Ryan Hickey

Familiarity with different instruments and understanding the basics of image guidance techniques are essential for interventional radiology trainees. However, there are no structured references in the literature, and trainees are left to “pick it up as they go”. Puncture needles, guidewires, sheath systems, and catheters represent some of the most commonly used daily instruments by interventional radiologists. There is a large variety of instruments, and understanding the properties of each tool will allow trainees to better assess which type is needed for each specific procedure. Along with understanding the tools required to perform various interventional radiology procedures, it is important for trainees to learn how to organize the room, procedural table, and various equipment that is used during the procedure. Minimizing clutter and improving organization leads to improved efficiency and decreased errors. In addition, having a fundamental knowledge of fluoroscopy, the most commonly used imaging modality, is an integral part of beginning training in interventional radiology.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 618-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark O. Baerlocher ◽  
Sean A. Kennedy ◽  
Thomas J. Ward ◽  
Boris Nikolic ◽  
Curtis W. Bakal ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 963-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sphoorti Shellikeri ◽  
Randolph M. Setser ◽  
Tiffany J. Hwang ◽  
Abhay Srinivasan ◽  
Ganesh Krishnamurthy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document