Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator: A Novel Treatment Approach for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Overview of Treatment, Including Diagnostic and Patient Criteria, Procedural Terminology Codes

CHEST Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fauziya Hassan ◽  
Neeraj Kaplish
SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A332-A332
Author(s):  
Sarah Sussman ◽  
Ashwin Ananth ◽  
Elie Fares ◽  
Colin Huntley ◽  
Maurits Boon ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The remedē® system is a transvenous phrenic nerve stimulator used to treat central sleep apnea (CSA). It is a safe and effective implantable device that has demonstrated significant improvements in objective sleep and quality of life. While complex sleep apnea represents development of central sleep apnea during treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea, and has been well-described in the literature, we present a novel case of predominantly central sleep apnea treated with phrenic nerve stimulation with augmentation of obstructive events thereafter. This patient is, at the time of submission, being evaluated for hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Report of case(s) A 63-year-old male patient with a past medical history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, GERD, obesity, and prior pulmonary embolism presented to the sleep medicine clinic with complaints of difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep, snoring, multiple nocturnal awakenings, excessive daytime sleepiness, and physical fatigue. On exam, BMI was 30.4, and airway classification was Mallampati 4. Split night polysomnography revealed severe mixed sleep apnea with an overall apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of 58.6 and a central AHI of 53.8 per hour after successful PAP titration at 7 cm H2O. He underwent phrenic nerve stimulator implantation and activation without complications. Phrenic nerve stimulation titration study four months after activation showed a normal central AHI of 4.6 per hour at a therapeutic voltage of 1.6 to 1.9mA, but significantly worse OSA with obstructive AHI of 53.1. In follow up, he reported intolerance of CPAP due to significant nasal congestion as well as asthma. Presently, he is scheduled for drug induced sleep endoscopy to visualize airway obstruction and is being evaluated for Inspire hypoglossal nerve stimulation and nasal surgery. Conclusion The treatment of sleep apnea has recently evolved rapidly with the development of implantable devices to treat both central and obstructive sleep apnea. We present a novel case of the first known patient to be considered for dual nerve stimulation for sleep apnea. Further study needs to be done to determine the safety and efficacy of concurrent implantable devices for the simultaneous treatment of OSA and CSA. Support (if any):


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 703-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Lewis ◽  
Boris Pételle ◽  
Matthew C. Campbell ◽  
Stuart MacKay ◽  
Carsten Palme ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (10) ◽  
pp. 975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay K. Rathi ◽  
Neil S. Kondamuri ◽  
Matthew R. Naunheim ◽  
Shekhar K. Gadkaree ◽  
Ralph B. Metson ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A468-A468
Author(s):  
Talayeh Rezayat ◽  
Melisa Chang

Abstract Introduction Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with positive airway pressure (PAP), mandibular advancement devices (MAD) and oral surgery have been reported to lead to emergent central sleep apnea (CSA). In this case report the emergence of CSA in a Cheyne-Stokes pattern following the use of hypoglossal nerve stimulator as a treatment modality for OSA is discussed. Report of Case A 70-year-old man with a history of hypothyroidism and severe OSA diagnosed via a home sleep apnea test with a respiratory event index (REI) of 38 events/ hr was intolerant of PAP therapy and an MAD did not effectively treat his OSA. He was deemed an appropriate candidate for hypoglossal nerve stimulation following a drug induced sleep endoscopy. Following implantation and activation, he developed a lip droop and was ruled out for a stroke. A polysomnogram was completed which showed significant improvement in his sleep apnea at a voltage range of 1.4-17V. At 1.8V he developed REM- supine central events. When the voltage was further increased to 1.9-2.0V non-REM supine central events arose. These events appeared to have Cheyne-Stoke morphology with a cycle duration of over 50s. He was set to an amplitude of 1.6 V with a positional belt for treatment of his OSA without any emergent CSA. Conclusion This patient developed central sleep apneas with Cheyne-Stoke morphology following treatment of obstructive sleep apnea using a hypoglossal nerve stimulator. The central events began at higher voltage settings (greater than 1.8V). He had no history of heart failure or arrhythmias. This higher voltage may lead to overshoot of the tongue out of the airway resulting in hyperpnea, hypocapnia and central apnea but the underlying pathophysiology for the Cheyne-Stoke pattern in the absence of heart failure remains unknown.


2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982098291
Author(s):  
Jason R. Crossley ◽  
Katherine Wallerius ◽  
Michael Hoa ◽  
Bruce Davidson ◽  
Jonathan P. Giurintano

Objective To determine if there is an association between authors’ financial conflict of interest and published position on clinical use of hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. Study Design Retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Setting International roster of authors and articles analyzed. Methods A Google Scholar search was performed for editorials and reviews citing the 2014 New England Journal of Medicine article on hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. Included articles were coded as favorable or neutral. Conflict of interest was recorded as declared by the authors in these articles and as independently searched in the Open Payments registry. Results Sixteen articles from 45 independent authors were analyzed. Nine articles by authors were coded as favorable. Among authors of articles with favorable views, 16 (59%) had a financial conflict of interest with the manufacturer of the hypoglossal nerve stimulator device, as opposed to only 1 of 21 (5%) authors of neutral/unfavorable articles. When we included only authors to whom payments could be identified or excluded on Open Payments, 16 of 20 (80%; 95% CI, 62%-98%) authors of favorable articles had a financial conflict, while 1 of 10 (10%; 95% CI, 0%-29.6%) of neutral/unfavorable articles did ( P = .004). Conclusion Our study demonstrates an association between published position on hypoglossal nerve stimulator use and financial conflict with the device manufacturer. Several undeclared conflicts were also found, suggesting a role for independent search for conflicts during the review process.


FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Paul B. Lee ◽  
Michael T. Chung ◽  
Jared Johnson ◽  
Jordyn Lucas ◽  
Caitlin R. Priest ◽  
...  

Objective: There is a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in pediatric and adult Down Syndrome (DS) patients that is refractory to adenotonsillectomy and continuous positive airway pressure. Newer treatment modalities have emerged with improved outcomes. The objective is to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the clinical outcomes of OSA in pediatric and adult DS patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulation using Inspire, midline posterior glossectomy plus lingual tonsillectomy (MPG + LT), and combined genioglossus advancement plus radiofrequency (GGS + RF). Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed followed by a meta-analysis. Studies with preoperative and post-operative Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) values were included with patients serving as their own control. Results: Across 5 studies, 56 patients were analyzed. The mean reduction in AHI was statistically significant before vs. after procedure ( P < .001 for hypoglossal nerve stimulation using Inspire with a paired 2-tailed t-test and P = .031 for MPG + LT). Although individual patient AHI values were unavailable in the GGS + RF study, the standard difference in mean AHI was also significant for GGS + RF with P = .001. Device malfunction was the most common complication for Inspire while postoperative bleeding was observed for MPG + LT and nasopharyngeal obstruction and retropalatal collapse were observed for GGS + RF. Conclusion: This review reveals significant improvement in AHI with Inspire, MPG + LT, and GGS + RF for DS patients with refractory OSA. Further investigation is needed for comparison between these 3 therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document