scholarly journals Gains from variety? Product differentiation and the possibility of losses from trade under Cournot oligopoly with free entry

2016 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 55-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Collie
2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tien-Der Han ◽  
M. Emranul Haque ◽  
Arijit Mukherjee

AbstractWe consider final goods producers’ preference for horizontal product differentiation in the presence of strategic input price determination. Final goods producers may not prefer maximal differentiation but may prefer moderate differentiation under both Cournot and Bertrand competition in the final goods market if product differentiation does not increase the market size significantly and there is either free entry in the input market or the input supplier has increasing returns to scale technology. Thus, we provide a new rationale for moderate product differentiation. Our reasons are different from the existing reasons of mixed pricing strategy, endogenous leadership, no-buy option for the consumers and the relative performance incentive schemes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiro Matsumura ◽  
Yasunori Okumura
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
James A. Brander ◽  
Barbara J. Spencer

AbstractWhen would an oligopolistic entrant imitate an incumbent’s product (“me-too” entry), rather than horizontally differentiate? We allow an entrant's product choice to vary endogenously with the cost of product differentiation. Such endogenity of product differentiation significantly affects the comparison of Bertrand and Cournot duopoly. We find that if Bertrand entry occurs, products are differentiated, whereas there is a substantial region in which Cournot entry involves a homogenous product. Bertrand prices may be higher than Cournot prices; and, if product differentiation costs are low enough to induce Cournot differentiated entry, then Bertrand industry profit equals or exceeds Cournot industry profit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document