Patient’s Peak Skin Dose evaluation using Gafchromic films in interventional cardiology procedures and its correlation with other dose indicators

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pasquino ◽  
C. Cutaia ◽  
M. Poli ◽  
C. Valero ◽  
G. Peroni ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Didier ◽  
David Bourhis ◽  
Chaker Oueslati ◽  
Bahaa Nasr ◽  
Florent Le Ven ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Chiara Valero ◽  
Claudia Cutaia ◽  
Matteo Poli ◽  
Giulia Peroni ◽  
Massimo Pasquino ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Greffier ◽  
C. Van Ngoc Ty ◽  
G. Bonniaud ◽  
G. Moliner ◽  
B. Ledermann ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Antar E. Aly ◽  
Ibrahim M. Duhaini ◽  
Samia M. Manaa ◽  
Sayed M. Tarique ◽  
Shehim E. Kuniyil ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110620
Author(s):  
Joelle Ann Feghali ◽  
Julie Delépierre ◽  
Olivera Ciraj Belac ◽  
Jérémie Dabin ◽  
Marine Deleu ◽  
...  

Background Optimizing patient exposure in interventional cardiology is key to avoid skin injuries. Purpose To establish predictive models of peak skin dose (PSD) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO), and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. Material and Methods A total of 534 PCI, 219 CTO, and 209 TAVI were collected from 12 hospitals in eight European countries. Independent associations between PSD and clinical and technical dose determinants were examined for those procedures using multivariate statistical analysis. A priori and a posteriori predictive models were built using stepwise multiple linear regressions. A fourfold cross-validation was performed, and models’ performance was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R²), and linear correlation coefficient (r). Results Multivariate analysis proved technical parameters to overweight clinical complexity indices with PSD mainly affected by fluoroscopy time, tube voltage, tube current, distance to detector, and tube angulation for PCI. For CTO, these were body mass index, tube voltage, and fluoroscopy contribution. For TAVI, these parameters were sex, fluoroscopy time, tube voltage, and cine acquisitions. When benchmarking the predictive models, the correlation coefficients were r = 0.45 for the a priori model and r = 0.89 for the a posteriori model for PCI. These were 0.44 and 0.67, respectively, for the CTO a priori and a posteriori models, and 0.58 and 0.74, respectively, for the TAVI a priori and a posteriori models. Conclusion A priori predictive models can help operators estimate the PSD before performing the intervention while a posteriori models are more accurate estimates and can be useful in the absence of skin dose mapping solutions


Open Heart ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. e000141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander S Pasciak ◽  
Austin C Bourgeois ◽  
A Kyle Jones

2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-399
Author(s):  
Chadia Rizk ◽  
Antoine Sarkis ◽  
Alice Bejjani ◽  
Jérémie Dabin ◽  
Jad Farah

Abstract This paper aims to validate the accuracy of the peak skin dose (Dskin,max) computed by the Dose Map software (DMS)—general electric and establish a local follow-up protocol for the management of patient skin injuries following complex interventional cardiology procedures (ICPs). Dskin,max was computed by the DMS and was simultaneously measured by a dense mesh of 72 thermoluminescent dosemeters for 20 ICP. Measured and computed Dskin,max were compared using Lin’s concordance coefficient (${\rho}_c$). The implementation of a local follow-up strategy was based on a computed Dskin,max of 2 Gy. After eliminating 2 outliers, the average deviation between the two methods was 6% (range: −36 to +40%). Concordance between the two methods was moderate with ${\rho}_c$ (confidence interval) of 0.9128 (0.8541–0.9486). DMS computes Dskin,max with an acceptable accuracy and can be used to setup an individual follow-up process for patients with high skin exposure and risks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document