Su1567 Nasojejunal Feeding Tube Placement Technique Utilizing Through-the-Scope Advancement: a Simple Technique Maximizing Distal Placement

Interest in noninvasive feeding tube placement in companion animals led to the adaption of a human technique utilizing endoscopy to place nasojejunal feeding tubes. Data from medical records in which nasojejunal feeding tubes were attempted were reviewed. Feeding tubes were attempted and successfully placed in five dogs within a median of 35 min. Feeding tubes remained in place for approximately 7 days. Complications included facial irritation (5/5), sneezing (5/5), fractured facial sutures (4/5), vomiting (3/5), diarrhea (3/5), crimping of feeding tube (3/5), regurgitation (1/5), epistaxis (1/5), clogging of the feeding tube (2/5), and oral migration with premature removal of the feeding tube (1/5). The deployment technique used in this study was found to be cumbersome. Despite minor complications, endoscopy can be used to rapidly and accurately place nasoenteric feeding devices.

Download Full-text

Rapid Placement of Transpyloric Feeding Tubes: A Comparison of pH-assisted and Standard Insertion Techniques in Children

PEDIATRICS ◽

10.1542/peds.98.2.242 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 98 (2) ◽

pp. 242-248

Author(s):

Brian Krafte-Jacobs ◽

Melody Persinger ◽

Jeannean Carver ◽

Lori Moore ◽

Richard Brilli

Keyword(s):

Hospital Costs ◽

Caloric Intake ◽

Feeding Tube ◽

Cost Comparison ◽

Tube Placement ◽

Critically Ill Children ◽

Standard Group ◽

Feeding Tubes ◽

Feeding Tube Placement ◽

Placement Technique

Objective. To compare transpyloric feeding tube placement using a pH-assisted placement technique versus a standard placement technique in pediatric patients requiring enteral nutrition. Methods. Critically ill children younger than 4 years were prospectively and randomly assigned to either a pH-assisted or a standard feeding tube placement group. Identical pH-assisted feeding tubes were used in both groups; however, feeding tubes in the standard group were not attached to a portable pH meter. Successful transpyloric placement was confirmed by radiography before beginning feedings. If placement was not successful, a second placement attempt was made after metoclopramide administration. Information regarding tube placement success, number of radiographs, time to initiaction of feedings, and daily caloric intake was collected. A cost comparison between the two groups was performed. Results. Thirty-four patients were enrolled in the pH-assisted group, and 34 were enrolled in the standard feeding tube group. Ninety-seven percent of patients in the pH-assisted group had successful placement after the first attempt, compared with 53% of patients in the standard group. The average time to successful placement of pH-assisted feeding tubes was 6 minutes. All patients in the pH-assisted group had successful placement after the second attempt, compared with 78% of patients in the standard group. A pH of greater than 5.6 accurately predicted transpyloric placement in 97% (33 of 34) of individuals in the pH-assisted group. Children in the pH-assisted group required significantly fewer radiographs than those in the standard group. Hospital costs were $114 per patient in the pH-assisted group and $135 per patient in the standard group. Conclusions. Our findings indicate that bedside transpyloric placement of pH-assisted feeding tubes can be accomplished rapidly and with a high success rate. This method is associated with decreased radiation exposure and economic savings when compared with a standard placement technique.

Download Full-text