scholarly journals Mo1349 A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 19-GAUGE (G) ASPIRATION NEEDLE VERSUS 19G CORE BIOPSY NEEDLE FOR ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED LIVER BIOPSY

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB457-AB458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael A. Ching Companioni ◽  
Amitpal S. Johal ◽  
Bradley Confer ◽  
Harshit S. Khara ◽  
David L. Diehl
Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 1059-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael A. Ching-Companioni ◽  
David L. Diehl ◽  
Amitpal S. Johal ◽  
Bradley D. Confer ◽  
Harshit S. Khara

Abstract Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is a safe and effective method for accomplishing parenchymal liver biopsy. The aim of this study was to compare a 19 G aspiration needle (FNA) with a 19 G Franseen-tip core biopsy needle (FNB) for EUS-LB. Methods This was a prospective, parallel group, randomized trial comparing the tissue yields and adequacy of a 19 G FNA needle vs. a 19 G FNB needle for EUS-LB. The primary outcome was length of the longest piece of liver core specimen. Secondary outcomes were aggregate specimen length, number of complete portal triads (CPTs), and adverse events. One transgastric pass and one transduodenal pass were performed with the same needle in each patient. Specimen lengths were measured before and after histological processing. Results 40 patients referred for EUS-LB were randomized to either the FNA group (n = 20) or the FNB group (n = 20). Both groups had similar patient characteristics. FNB biopsies yielded longer mean (standard deviation) specimen lengths (pre-processing mean 2.09 cm [0.41] vs. mean 1.47 cm [0.46], and post-processing mean 1.78 cm [0.66] vs. mean 1.05 cm [0.42]; both P < 0.001), a longer aggregate specimen length (pre-processing mean 15.78 cm [5.19] vs. 10.89 cm [4.38]; P = 0.003), and more CPTs (mean 42.6 25 vs 18.1 [9.3]; P < 0.001) compared with the FNA needle. There were no severe adverse events or difference in adverse event rate between the two needles. Post-biopsy pain was noted in 37.5 %. Conclusion EUS-LB using the FNB needle delivered longer liver biopsy specimens with more CPTs than the regular (non-core) needle.


2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. AB473-AB474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaffer R. Mok ◽  
David L. Diehl ◽  
Amitpal S. Johal ◽  
Harshit S. Khara ◽  
Mia Diehl ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. E165-E171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Schlag ◽  
Christoph Menzel ◽  
Manuela Götzberger ◽  
Simon Nennstiel ◽  
Peter Klare ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims The optimal approach to small subepithelial tumors (SETs) of the upper gastrointestinal tract remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for less invasive tissue sampling of small SETs of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Patients and methods In this prospective observational study patients with small ( ≤ 3 cm) SETs of the upper gastrointestinal tract were eligible and underwent EUS-FNB with a 22-gauge core biopsy needle. The main outcome measure was the diagnostic yield. The number of obtained core biopsies was also assessed. Results Twenty patients were included. The mean SET size was 16 mm (range 10 – 27 mm). EUS-FNB was technically feasible in all cases and no complications were observed. The diagnostic yield was 75 %. Core biopsy specimens were obtained in only 25 % of cases. Conclusion EUS-FNB with a 22-gauge core biopsy needle of small SETs can achieve a definite diagnosis in the majority of cases. However, because core samples cannot regularly be obtained, EUS-FNB seems not to be convincingly superior to standard EUS-FNA in this setting


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document