Effects of residual hearing on cochlear implant outcomes in children: A systematic-review

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 119-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Santos Costa Chiossi ◽  
Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 549-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariane Perin da Silva ◽  
Ademir Antonio Comerlatto Junior ◽  
Maria Cecília Bevilacqua ◽  
Simone Aparecida Lopes-Herrera

Author(s):  
Simone Schaefer ◽  
Maryam Sahwan ◽  
Aleksandra Metryka ◽  
Karolina Kluk ◽  
Iain A. Bruce

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Kathrin Malfeld ◽  
Nina Armbrecht ◽  
Holger A. Volk ◽  
Thomas Lenarz ◽  
Verena Scheper

In recent years sensorineural hearing loss was found to affect not exclusively, nor at first, the sensory cells of the inner ear. The sensory cells’ synapses and subsequent neurites are initially damaged. Auditory synaptopathies also play an important role in cochlear implant (CI) care, as they can lead to a loss of physiological hearing in patients with residual hearing. These auditory synaptopathies and in general the cascades of hearing pathologies have been in the focus of research in recent years with the aim to develop more targeted and individually tailored therapeutics. In the current study, a method to examine implanted inner ears of guinea pigs was developed to examine the synapse level. For this purpose, the cochlea is made transparent and scanned with the implant in situ using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Three different preparation methods were compared to enable both an overview image of the cochlea for assessing the CI position and images of the synapses on the same specimen. The best results were achieved by dissection of the bony capsule of the cochlea.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1574-1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanin Rayes ◽  
Ghada Al-Malky ◽  
Deborah Vickers

Objective The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the published research in auditory training (AT) for pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients. This review investigates whether AT in children with CIs leads to improvements in speech and language development, cognition, and/or quality of life and whether improvements, if any, remain over time post AT intervention. Method A systematic search of 7 databases identified 96 review articles published up until January 2017, 9 of which met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and independently assessed for risk of bias and quality of study against a PICOS (participants, intervention, control, outcomes, and study) framework. Results All studies reported improvements in trained AT tasks, including speech discrimination/identification and working memory. Retention of improvements over time was found whenever it was assessed. Transfer of learning was measured in 4 of 6 studies, which assessed generalization. Quality of life was not assessed. Overall, evidence for the included studies was deemed to be of low quality. Conclusion Benefits of AT were illustrated through the improvement in trained tasks, and this was observed in all reviewed studies. Transfer of improvement to other domains and also retention of benefits post AT were evident when assessed, although rarely done. However, higher quality evidence to further examine outcomes of AT in pediatric CI recipients is needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. e161-e167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanthaiah Koka ◽  
Aniket A. Saoji ◽  
Leonid M. Litvak

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 1343-1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
George B. Wanna ◽  
Jack H. Noble ◽  
Rene H. Gifford ◽  
Mary S. Dietrich ◽  
Alex D. Sweeney ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. e373-e380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Sierra ◽  
Manuela Calderón ◽  
Eduardo Bárcena ◽  
Alexandra Tisaire ◽  
Eduardo Raboso

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document