scholarly journals Repair of the middle and posterior compartments of the pelvic floor via perineal and vaginal routes without the use of mesh - technique description and case series

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-351
Author(s):  
Raquel Ferreira Nogueira ◽  
Renata Soares Paolinelli Botinha Macedo ◽  
Sinara Mônica de Oliveira Leite
2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 3496-3499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Chiara Sighinolfi ◽  
Massimo Rivalta ◽  
Alessandro Mofferdin ◽  
Salvatore Micali ◽  
Stefano De Stefani ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chloe Theodorou ◽  
Zia Moinuddin ◽  
David Van Dellen

Abstract Aims Incisional hernias are a common complication after surgery that cause significant patient morbidity. Symptomatic patients are offered repair but many surgical techniques exist, with abdominal wall reconstruction becoming preferable for large complex defects. This paper describes our experience of abdominal wall reconstruction using a dual mesh technique. Method 22 patients underwent incisional hernia repair between March 2019 and September 2020. All patients received dual mesh, placed in retrorectus or transversalis fascial/retromuscular space. Absorbable BIO-A GORE mesh was used with a polypropylene mesh above. All patients were followed up to assess for complications and recurrence. Results No patients experienced fistula formation, long-term pain or obstructive symptoms. We report one true hernia recurrence (4.5%) and one case of infected mesh (4.5%), these both await further treatment. One patient had a proven wound infection which resolved with conservative treatment. 4 patients (18.2%) experienced seromas, 3 of these resolved spontaneously, one requiring image-guided drainage. Conclusion Incisional hernia repair using combination polypropylene and bio-absorbable mesh provides a safe and effective repair with low recurrence and incidence of surgical site occurrences in the short term. Longer follow up and further studies are needed to evaluate this mesh technique to support ongoing use of absorbable meshes in complex hernia repair.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 886-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah K Tandon ◽  
Pamela Stratton ◽  
Ninet Sinaii ◽  
Jay Shah ◽  
Barbara I Karp

Background and objectivesMany women with endometriosis continue to have pelvic pain despite optimal surgical and hormonal treatment; some also have palpable pelvic floor muscle spasm. We describe changes in pain, spasm, and disability after pelvic muscle onabotulinumtoxinA injection in women with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, a specific population not addressed in prior pelvic pain studies on botulinum toxin.MethodsWe present an open-label proof-of-concept case series of women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis. Under conscious sedation and with topical anesthetic, 100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA was injected transvaginally into pelvic floor muscle spasm areas under electromyography guidance. Changes in pain intensity, muscle spasm, disability, and pain medication use were assessed at periodic visits for up to 1 year after injection.ResultsThirteen women underwent botulinum toxin injection and were followed for at least 4 months. Before injection, 11 of the 13 women had spasm in >4/6 assessed pelvic muscles and reported moderate pain (median visual analog scale (VAS): 5/10; range: 2–7). By 4–8 weeks after injection, spasm was absent/less widespread (≤3 muscles) in all (p=0.0005). Eleven rated their postinjection pain as absent/mild (median VAS: 2; range: 0–5; p<0.0001); 7/13 reduced pain medication. Disability decreased in 6/8 women with at least moderate preinjection disability (p=0.0033). Relief lasted 5–11 months in 7 of the 11 patients followed for up to 1 year. Adverse events were mild and transient.ConclusionsThese findings suggest pelvic floor spasm may be a major contributor to endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Botulinum toxin injection may provide meaningful relief of pain and associated disability.Trial registration numberNCT01553201


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document