Laser in situ keratomileusis to manage refractive errors after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1020-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Banu Torun Acar ◽  
Canan A. Utine ◽  
Suphi Acar ◽  
Ferda Ciftci
2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 773-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Villarrubia ◽  
Juan J. Pérez-Santonja ◽  
Elisa Palacín ◽  
Paz Rodríguez-Ausín P ◽  
Antonio Hidalgo

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 2011-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramin Salouti ◽  
Mohammad H. Nowroozzadeh ◽  
Payam Makateb ◽  
Mohammad Zamani ◽  
Maryam Ghoreyshi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 831-835
Author(s):  
Bhupesh Singh ◽  
Sourabh Sharma ◽  
Neha Bharti ◽  
Dharitri Samantaray ◽  
Sudhank Bharti

The purpose is to present the outcomes of anterior lamellar keratoplasty for a case of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) epithelial ingrowth. A 40-year-old male patient presented with epithelial ingrowth 14 years after primary LASIK with a microkeratome blade in the right eye following trauma. Multiple stromal bed washing was done over a period of 3 years, but recurrence of epithelial ingrowth was seen every time. Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior lamellar keratoplasty was performed in the right eye. Twelve months after the procedure, the patient’s corrected distance visual acuity improved to 6/9, and no recurrence was noted. Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior lamellar keratoplasty is an effective treatment modality in cases of recurrent recalcitrant epithelial ingrowth seen after LASIK.


2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (12) ◽  
pp. 1646-1652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R Ross ◽  
Dalia G Said ◽  
Abdalla El-Amin ◽  
Saif Altaan ◽  
Javier Cabrerizo ◽  
...  

AimsTo investigate and define the nature of big bubbles (BB) formed by injection of viscoelastic in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.MethodsIntrastromal injections of 0.1 and 0.3 mL of sodium hyaluronate 1.2% and 0.6% were made into sclera-corneal discs (n = 32) at superficial (anterior-third), midstromal (middle-third) and deep (posterior-third) levels to simulate deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Postinjection optical coherence tomograms (OCT) were obtained with the needle in situ. The samples were sectioned and examined histologically. Twelve control samples were injected with air.ResultsWith superficial injections (n=8) only intrastromal accumulation of viscoelastic was noted. With midstromal injections (n=10) intrastromal accumulation of viscoelastic (n=6) and intrastromal big bubbles (IBB) (n=4) with substantial and variable stromal tissue in the walls were noted. No type 1, type 2 or mixed BB were noted. With deep injections (n=14), type 1 BB (n=4), IBB (n=4) and mixed BB (n=6) were obtained.There was no difference in the results with the two different concentrations of viscoelastic used. With air injection (n=12), 10 type 1 and 1 type 2 BB and 1 mixed BB were obtained. No IBB was noted.ConclusionsBB obtained by injection of viscoelastic and air can be different. The former tends to occur at the site of injection, especially with midstromal injections, takes the form of tissue separation by stretch and tearing and does not cleave in a consistent plane like air. Surgeons should be aware of IBB created by viscodissection and not confuse it for a type1 BB. Intraoperative OCT should help identify IBB.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document