scholarly journals Reliable Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) Classification System of Rotator Cuff Tears

Author(s):  
Emilio Calvo ◽  
Carlos Rebollón ◽  
Eiji Itoi ◽  
Andreas Imhoff ◽  
Felix H. Savoie ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (S1) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Castricini ◽  
M. De Benedetto ◽  
N. Orlando ◽  
E. Gervasi ◽  
A. Castagna

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0033
Author(s):  
John Feldman ◽  
Mims Ochsner ◽  
Glenn Fleisig ◽  
Rob Tatum ◽  
Lindsay Grosz ◽  
...  

Objectives: All-suture anchor use for rotator cuff repair is increasing. Potential benefits of these anchors include less bone loss from anchor hole drilling and decreased injury to the chondral surface with anchor pullout. Minimal evidence exists comparing clinical outcomes of all suture to solid medial row anchor fixation in double row suture bridge rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes for rotator cuff tears treated with all-suture medial row anchors to those treated with more traditional solid anchors. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference in outcomes between the all-suture and solid anchor rotator cuff repairs. Methods: Three sports medicine fellowship trained surgeons performed rotator cuff repairs using the double row suture bridge technique with minimum 3 years of follow up. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether or not they received all-suture or solid anchor fixation for the medial row of their repair. All lateral row fixation was performed with solid anchors. Primary outcomes were evaluated with telephone follow-up and included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Rehabilitation protocol was the same for all subjects in the study. Results: 3 sports medicine fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons performed 153 rotator cuff repairs. 91 of these subjects had all-suture fixation of the medial row and 62 received solid anchor fixation. Follow up was 3.6 years ± 0.6 for the all-suture group and 3.7 years ± 0.6 in the solid anchor group (p= 0.28). ASES scores were 92 ± 16 in the all-suture group and 90 ± 17 in the solid group (p =0.35). SANE scores were 91 ± 13 in the all-suture and also 91 ± 13 in the solid anchor cohort (p = 0.97). VAS scores were 1.1 ± 2.0 in the all-suture and 0.7± 1.8 in the solid anchor group (p=0.17). There were no significant differences between groups with regards to re-operation rate or anchor configuration. Conclusions: All suture anchors used in medial row fixation for double row suture bridge rotator cuff repairs have similar clinical outcomes to rotator cuff tears treated in similar fashion with solid medial row anchors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document