scholarly journals All-Suture and Solid Medial Row Anchors Produce Similar Clinical Outcomes for Double Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair (227)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0033
Author(s):  
John Feldman ◽  
Mims Ochsner ◽  
Glenn Fleisig ◽  
Rob Tatum ◽  
Lindsay Grosz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Anchor Fixation

Objectives: All-suture anchor use for rotator cuff repair is increasing. Potential benefits of these anchors include less bone loss from anchor hole drilling and decreased injury to the chondral surface with anchor pullout. Minimal evidence exists comparing clinical outcomes of all suture to solid medial row anchor fixation in double row suture bridge rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes for rotator cuff tears treated with all-suture medial row anchors to those treated with more traditional solid anchors. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference in outcomes between the all-suture and solid anchor rotator cuff repairs. Methods: Three sports medicine fellowship trained surgeons performed rotator cuff repairs using the double row suture bridge technique with minimum 3 years of follow up. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether or not they received all-suture or solid anchor fixation for the medial row of their repair. All lateral row fixation was performed with solid anchors. Primary outcomes were evaluated with telephone follow-up and included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Rehabilitation protocol was the same for all subjects in the study. Results: 3 sports medicine fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons performed 153 rotator cuff repairs. 91 of these subjects had all-suture fixation of the medial row and 62 received solid anchor fixation. Follow up was 3.6 years ± 0.6 for the all-suture group and 3.7 years ± 0.6 in the solid anchor group (p= 0.28). ASES scores were 92 ± 16 in the all-suture group and 90 ± 17 in the solid group (p =0.35). SANE scores were 91 ± 13 in the all-suture and also 91 ± 13 in the solid anchor cohort (p = 0.97). VAS scores were 1.1 ± 2.0 in the all-suture and 0.7± 1.8 in the solid anchor group (p=0.17). There were no significant differences between groups with regards to re-operation rate or anchor configuration. Conclusions: All suture anchors used in medial row fixation for double row suture bridge rotator cuff repairs have similar clinical outcomes to rotator cuff tears treated in similar fashion with solid medial row anchors.

scholarly journals Minimum Five-Year Outcomes and Clinical Survivorship Following Arthroscopic Double-Row Repair for Full-thickness Supraspinatus Tears

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0007
Author(s):  
Jonas Pogorzelski ◽  
Erik M. Fritz ◽  
Marilee P. Horan ◽  
Zaamin B. Hussain ◽  
Christoph Katthagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Supraspinatus Tendon ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Survivorship Analysis ◽  
Double Row Repair ◽  
Cuff Repair

Objectives: Rotator cuff tears lead to significant morbidity due to pain and decreased function. Despite the prevalence of cuff repairs, mid-term outcomes have been scarcely reported. The purpose of this study is to report minimum 5-year outcomes and clinical survivorship after double-row rotator cuff repair for full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears. Methods: Patients at least five years out from arthroscopic double-row repair for a full-thickness cuff tear involving the supraspinatus tendon were included. Pre- and postoperative ASES, SF-12 PCS, QuickDASH, SANE, and satisfaction scores were collected. The relationship between outcomes and (1) tear chronicity, (2) number of tendons involved, (3) type of repair, and (4) primary versus revision procedure, was also evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted defining failures as progression to revision rotator cuff surgery. Results: From November 2005 to February 2012, a total of 189 shoulders were eligible for inclusion. Fifteen shoulders (7.9%) underwent revision rotator cuff repair and were considered failures. Outcomes data were reported at a mean follow-up of 6.6 (range, 5.0-11.0) years. All outcome scores significantly improved from pre- to postoperative time point, including mean ASES (57.9 to 92.9, P < 0.001), SF-12 PCS (43.4 to 52.0, P < 0.001), QuickDASH (35.2 to 10.5, P < 0.001), and SANE scores (61.5 to 86.5, P < 0.001). Acute tears demonstrated significantly better ASES and SANE scores than chronic tears (ASES 95.1 ± 8.9 versus 91.7 ± 11.2, P = 0.025; SANE 89.6 ± 19.9 versus 85.7 ± 21.3, P = 0.042). No other analyzed variable had a significant association with outcomes scores ( P > 0.05). Survivorship analysis demonstrated a postoperative clinical survivorship of the repair of 96.5% at two years and 93.8% at five years (Figure 1). Conclusion: Patients can expect excellent clinical outcomes and a low failure rate following arthroscopic double-row repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tears at mid-term follow-up. The repair of acute tears and primary repairs were associated with better postoperative outcomes.

scholarly journals Linked Double-Row Equivalent Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Leads to Significantly Improved Patient Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 232596712093831
Author(s):  
Atsushi Endo ◽  
Paul Hoogervorst ◽  
Conrad Safranek ◽  
Kyle R. Sochacki ◽  
Marc R. Safran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a linked double-row equivalent construct results in significantly higher load to failure compared with conventional transosseous-equivalent constructs. Purpose: To determine the patient-reported outcomes (PROs), reoperation rates, and complication rates after linked double-row equivalent rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent linked double-row equivalent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. The primary outcome was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS), reoperations, and complications. Clinical relevance was defined by the minimally clinically important difference (MCID). Comparisons on an individual level that exceeded MCID (individual-level scores) were deemed clinically relevant. Comparisons between preoperative and postoperative scores were completed using the Student t test. All P values were reported with significance set at P < .05. Results: A total of 42 shoulders in 41 consecutive patients were included in this study (21 male patients [51.2%]; mean age, 64.5 ± 11.9 years; mean follow-up, 29.7 ± 4.5 months). All patients (100%) completed the minimum 2-year follow-up. The rotator cuff tear measured on average 15.2 ± 8.9 mm in the coronal plane and 14.6 ± 9.8 mm in the sagittal plane. The ASES score improved significantly from 35.5 ± 18.2 preoperatively to 93.4 ± 10.6 postoperatively ( P < .001). The QuickDASH ( P < .001), SST ( P < .001), and VAS ( P < .001) scores also significantly improved after surgery. All patients (42/42 shoulders; 100%) achieved clinically relevant improvement (met or exceeded MCID) on ASES and SST scores postoperatively. There were no postoperative complications (0.0%) or reoperations (0.0%) at final follow-up. Conclusion: Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with the linked double-row equivalent construct results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in PRO scores with low complication rates (0.0%) and reoperation rates (0.0%) at short-term follow-up.

scholarly journals Treatment of Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Does Infraspinatus Muscle Tear Affect Repair Integrity?

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-209
Author(s):  
Sungwook Choi ◽  
Hyunchul Yang ◽  
Hyunseong Kang ◽  
Gyeong Min Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Infraspinatus Muscle ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Clinical outcomes and prognosis of large and massive rotator cuff tears are known to be unpredictable not only in degeneration of the rotator cuff, but also due to a high rate of retear.Methods: Totally, 81 patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from May 2008 to February 2016 were evaluated in our study. Clinical and functional evaluations were performed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, as well as full physical examination of the shoulder. All patients were confirmed to have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tendon healing at least 1 year postoperatively.Results: The average age at the time of surgery was 65 years (range, 47?78 years). The average duration of postoperative time in which a follow-up MRI was performed was 36.1 months (range, 12?110 months). Large tears were present in 48 cases (59.3%) and massive tears in 33 cases (40.7%). Overall, there were 33 retear cases (40.7%). All the average clinical outcome scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up (<i>p</i><0.001), although repair integrity was not maintained. Compared to type A, types C, and D of the Collin’s classification showed significantly higher retear rates (<i>p</i>=0.036).Conclusions: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair yields improved clinical outcomes and a relatively high degree of patient satisfaction, despite the repair integrity not being maintained. Involvement of the subscapularis muscle or infraspinatus muscle had no effect on the retear rate.

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes of Primary Arthroscopic Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110154
Author(s):  
Adam M. Johannsen ◽  
Justin W. Arner ◽  
Bryant P. Elrick ◽  
Philip-C. Nolte ◽  
Dylan R. Rakowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Modern rotator cuff repair techniques demonstrate favorable early and midterm outcomes, but long-term results have yet to be reported. Purpose: To determine 10-year outcomes and survivorship after arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence 4. Methods: The primary TOE rotator cuff repair procedure was performed using either a knotted suture bridge or knotless tape bridge technique on a series of patients with 1 to 3 tendon full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus. Only patients who were 10 years postsurgery were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected pre- and postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Failure was defined as progression to revision surgery. Results: A total of 91 shoulders (56 men, 31 women) were included between October 2005 and December 2009. Mean follow-up was 11.5 years (range, 10.0-14.1 years). Of 91 shoulders, 5 (5.5%) failed and required revision surgery. Patient-reported outcomes for patients who survived were known for 80% (69/86). Outcomes scores at final follow-up were as follows: ASES, 93.1 ± 10.8; SANE, 87.5 ± 14.2; QuickDASH, 11.1 ± 13.5; and SF-12 physical component summary (PCS), 49.2 ± 10.1. There were statistically significant declines in ASES, SANE, and SF-12 PCS from the 5-year to 10-year follow-up, but none of these changes met the minimally clinically important difference threshold. Median satisfaction at final follow-up was 10 (range, 3-10). From this cohort, Kaplan-Meier survivorship demonstrated a 94.4% survival rate at a minimum of 10 years. Conclusion: Arthroscopic TOE rotator cuff repair demonstrates high patient satisfaction and low revision rates at a mean follow-up of 11.5 years. This information may be directly utilized in surgical decision making and preoperative patient counseling regarding the longevity of modern double-row rotator cuff repair.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair and Evaluation of Cuff Integrity by CT Arthrography

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-206
Author(s):  
Chris H. Jo ◽  
Je-Kyoon Kim ◽  
Kang-Sup Yoon ◽  
Ji-Ho Lee ◽  
Seung-Baek Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Ct Arthrography ◽  
Cuff Repair
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document