Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy for Treatment of Nonprolapsed Uterus

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Ghomi ◽  
Sarah L. Cohen ◽  
Niraj Chavan ◽  
Camille Gunderson ◽  
Jon Einarsson
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy ◽  
Supracervical Hysterectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

scholarly journals Pelviscopic Compared to Laparotomic and Vaginal Intrafascial Hysterectomy

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-239
Author(s):  
L. Mettler ◽  
N. Lutzewitsch
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Supracervical Hysterectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Indications For Operation ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted ◽  
Benign Disorders ◽  
The University

Between 1993 and 1994, 368 women underwent hysterectomies for benign disorders at the University of Kiel. Of these, 58.7% were performed either by pelviscopic or by laparotomy Classic Intrafascial Supracervical Hysterectomy (CISH). Of the remaining, 14.8% were performed by abdominal hysterectomy, 13.6% by Intrafascial Vaginal Hysterectomy (IVH), 12.2% by Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH), and only 0.05% by Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy (LAVH). Comparative data of these six surgical techniques concerning patients characteristics, indications for operation, histological features, blood loss, operating time, hospital stay, uterine weights and postoperatively used analgesics are described.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document