scholarly journals A meta-analysis of comparative studies of endovascular versus open repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury

2008 ◽  
Vol 135 (6) ◽  
pp. 1392-1394.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisato Takagi ◽  
Norikazu Kawai ◽  
Takuya Umemoto
Aorta ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Can Topcu ◽  
Kamile Ozeren-Topcu ◽  
Ahmet Bolukcu ◽  
Sinan Sahin ◽  
Avni U. Seyhan ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective In blunt trauma patients, injury of the thoracic aorta is the second most common cause of death after head injury. In recent years, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has largely replaced open repair as the primary treatment modality, and delayed repair of stable aortic injuries has been shown to improve mortality. In light of these major advancements, we present a 10-year institutional experience from a tertiary cardiovascular surgery center. Methods Records of patients who underwent endovascular or open repair of the ascending, arch or descending thoracic aorta between January 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients without blunt traumatic etiology were excluded. Perioperative data were retrospectively collected from patient charts. Long-term follow-up was performed via data from follow-up visits and phone calls. Results A total of 1,667 patients underwent 1,740 thoracic aortic procedures (172 TEVAR and 1,568 open repair). There were 13 patients (12 males) with a diagnosis of blunt thoracic aortic injury. Mean patient age was 43.6 years (range, 16–80 years). Ten (77%) patients underwent TEVAR, two (15.4%) underwent open repair, and one (7.7%) was treated nonoperatively. Procedure-related stroke was observed in one (7.7%) case. Procedure-related paraplegia did not occur in any patients. Left subclavian artery origin was covered in seven patients. None developed arm ischemia. Hospital survivors were followed-up for an average of 60.2 months (range, 4–115 months) without any late mortality, endoleak, stent migration, arm ischemia, or reintervention. Conclusion Blunt thoracic aortic injury is a rare but highly fatal condition. TEVAR offers good early and midterm results. Left subclavian artery coverage can be performed without major complications.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Erben ◽  
Gerardo Trejo ◽  
Adam J. Brownstein ◽  
Raymond A. Jean ◽  
Bulat A. Ziganshin ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 349-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisato Takagi ◽  
Hideaki Manabe ◽  
Norikazu Kawai ◽  
Shin-nosuke Goto ◽  
Takuya Umemoto

2012 ◽  
Vol 214 (6) ◽  
pp. 943-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Cannon ◽  
Jaimin R. Trivedi ◽  
Sebastian Pagni ◽  
Amit Dwivedi ◽  
Jennifer N. Bland ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-52
Author(s):  
Krishnaprasad Bashyal ◽  
Uttam Krishna Shrestha ◽  
Kajan Raj Shrestha ◽  
Dinesh Gurung

Thoracic aortic injuries are fatal with less than 50% patients surviving beyond 24 hours even after reaching the hospital if approach is delayed. Rapid transportation, adequate resuscitation, prompt radiological diagnosis, and urgent repair significantly improves outcomes. Even after a food repair, complications such as spinal cord ischemia causing paraplegia and acute lung injury significantly increase the morbidity. Thoracic endovascular repair may appear to be superior to open repair, but its long-term results and efficacy are not well established. We present our experience with open repair in managing this challenging acute emergency and certain measures to avert common but grievous complications.


2007 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 1965-1970 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kokotsakis ◽  
Ioannis Kaskarelis ◽  
Panagiotis Misthos ◽  
Thanos Athanasiou ◽  
Konstantinos Kanakakis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Bade-Boon ◽  
Joseph K Mathew ◽  
Mark C Fitzgerald ◽  
Biswadev Mitra

BackgroundBlunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is an uncommon diagnosis, usually developing as a consequence of high-impact acceleration–deceleration mechanisms. Timely diagnosis may enable early resuscitation and reduction of shear forces, essential to prevent worsening of the injury prior to definitive management. Death is commonly due to haemorrhagic shock, but clinical features may be absent until sudden and massive haemorrhage.ObjectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to determine the proportion of patients with BTAI who present with unstable vital signs.MethodsManuscripts were identified through a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases, focusing on subject headings and keywords related to the aorta and trauma. Mechanisms of injury, haemodynamic status and mortality from the included manuscripts were reviewed. Meta-analysis of presenting haemodynamic status among a select group of similar papers was conducted.ResultsNineteen studies were included, with five selected for meta-analysis. Most reported cases of BTAI (80.0%–100%) were caused by road traffic incidents, with mortality consistently higher among initially unstable patients. There was statistically significant heterogeneity among the included studies (P<0.01). The pooled proportion of patients with haemodynamic instability in the setting of BTAI was 48.8% (95% CI 8.3 to 89.4).ConclusionsNormal vital signs do not rule out aortic injury. A high degree of clinical suspicion and liberal use of imaging is necessary to prevent missed or delayed diagnoses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document