Background: Advancements in diagnosis and cancer treatment mean survival rates have improved but as a consequence many people are living with the adverse physical effects of complex treatments, financial hardship, work and relationship stress, and fear of recurrence. Person-centered, holistic care is required to help people maximize all aspects of their quality of life when living with and beyond their cancer, but debate continues around which models are economically sustainable and effective in achieving the desired outcomes. Maggie's ( www.maggiescentres.org ) is an innovative, multidisciplinary model of holistic supportive cancer care, widely regarded as an exemplar of best practice in cancer rehabilitation and supported self-management. In 2017 Maggie's received 249,247 visits across the network of centres in the UK, Hong Kong and Tokyo. The Maggie's program is designed to incorporate evidence based psychoeducation techniques delivered by multidisciplinary oncology professionals; offer personalised and understandable treatment and lifestyle information; and maximize the opportunity for social-support. Outcome evaluation is embedded within the model of care. Aim: To illustrate the holistic Maggie's model using outcome data from “Managing Stress” and “Living with and after Prostate Cancer (LWAPC)” courses to provide examples of the impact Maggie´s makes in enhancing quality of life. Methods: A subset of participants in “Managing Stress” and “Living with and after Prostate Cancer” courses across the network of UK Maggie´s Centres completed pre and post course standardized questionnaires. Results: Participants in “Managing Stress” found significant improvements in overall psychological well-being and quality of life (QoL) (t(40)=3.28, P = .002) and significant improvements in their ability to tolerate uncertainty (t(47) = 3.23, P = .002). Participants in the LWAPC found significant improvements in overall prostate cancer specific QoL ( t(37)=3.603, P = .001), general well-being ( t(37)=2.61, P = .013), and emotional well-being ( t(37)=2.62, P = .013). Also, significant reductions were found in overall negative appraisal of life (t(52)=2.96, P = .005), overall health worries (t(52) 2.28, P = 0.27), worries about the future (t(52) = 2.85, P = .006) and uncertainty (t(52) = 3.89, P < .001). Conclusion: Globally, the supportive care needs of people affected by cancer are changing but the Maggie's model of care offers valuable lessons that can be generalized across varied support settings to meet these emerging needs.
Regional Variation in Quality of Prostate Cancer Care