scholarly journals High Utilizers Of Health Care Resources: Results From The Multicenter Compact Study Of Complications In Patients With Sickle Cell Disease And Utilization Of Iron Chelation Therapy

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. A143-A144
Author(s):  
L. Jordan ◽  
P. Adams-Graves ◽  
J. Kanter-Washko ◽  
P. Oneal ◽  
M. Sasane ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. 943-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir K. Ballas ◽  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
Vu H. Duong ◽  
Michelle DeVeaux ◽  
Matthew M. Heeney

2010 ◽  
pp. 689-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet L. Kwiatkowski ◽  
John B. Porter ◽  
Martin H. Steinberg ◽  
Bernard G. Forget ◽  
Douglas R. Higgs ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 982-982
Author(s):  
Lanetta B Jordan ◽  
Patricia Adams-Graves ◽  
Julie Kanter-Washko ◽  
Patricia A Oneal ◽  
Medha Sasane ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction While treating patients (pts) with sickle cell disease (SCD) can be costly, costs are not evenly distributed across pts; rather, a minority of pts accounts for a majority of costs. Identifying those pts who consume a disproportionately large share of healthcare resources can assist payers and providers in directing appropriate and targeted interventions to deliver better pt care with lower costs. The objective of this study was to understand characteristics of pts who have increased utilization of inpatient (IP) and emergency department (ED) resources in a population of SCD pts ≥16 years old. Method Medical records of 254 SCD pts ≥16 years old were retrospectively reviewed between 8/2011 and 7/2012 at three US tertiary care centers. The high utilization threshold was derived from the literature and defined as pts with ≥ 5 days of IP+ED care (assuming 1 day/ED visit) for SCD-related complications per year (high utilizer group). Pts were also classified into cohorts based on cumulative blood transfusion units and use iron chelation therapy (ICT): <15 units, no ICT (Cohort 1 [C1]), ≥15 units, no ICT (Cohort 2 [C2]), and ≥15 units, with ICT (Cohort 3 [C3]). SCD complication rates were expressed as the number of SCD complications per pt per year (PPPY); rate ratios (RRs) were used for cohort comparisons. A logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with high utilization of IP+ED care. Results Of the 254 pts (C1: 69, C2: 91, C3: 94), 30% (n =76) were classified as high utilizers (C1: 14 [18.4%], C2: 37 [48.7%], C3: 25 [32.9%]). Patients in the high utilizer group were younger (median [range] (21 years old [16-65], vs. 23 years old [16-59]) and had shorter follow-up (4.2 years [0.6-23.9], vs. 5.4 years [0.5-33.3]) compared to the rest of the sample. Those in the high utilizer group accounted for 68% of all SCD-related complications and over 88% of all IP+ED days for treatment of these complications. Similar to the rest of the sample, pain (81%) and infection (7%) were the two key complications seen in this high utilizer group. The rate of IP +ED days was significantly higher among the high utilizer group with 16.63 [16.28-16.99] IP+ED days PPPY compared to 0.89 [0.84-0.94] PPPY for other pts. Similarly, the high utilizer group had 4.58 [95% CI: 4.39-4.76] IP+ED visits PPPY, compared to 0.34 [0.31-0.37] visits PPPY for other pts (Table). Among regularly transfused pts (C2+C3) in the high utilizer group, those who received ICT had lower rates of IP+ED visits (C2 vs. C3 rate ratio [RR] [95% CI]: 1.31[1.20-1.44]), IP+ED days (C2 vs. C3 RR: 1.30 [1.24-1.36]), and readmission to IP+ED settings within 30 days (1.70 [1.49-1.93]) compared with those who did not (Table). History of infections (odds ratio: 7.45, p<0.0001) was associated with an increased risk of high utilization of IP+ED care. Conclusion Results from this study show that a relatively small fraction of SCD pts account for the majority of IP+ED visits. Moreover, among regularly transfused pts identified as high utilizers, those who received ICT had lower rates of IP+ED utilization than those who did not. Pts receiving ICT may also receive closer monitoring, which may help with early identification and intervention to delay or prevent the development of complications and improve outcomes. Closer management of pts with SCD, especially those at risk of becoming high utilizers, is critical to lowering IP+ED utilization and reducing the overall costs of care. Disclosures: Jordan: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. Adams-Graves:Analysis Group, Inc.: Research Funding. Kanter-Washko:Analysis Group, Inc.: Research Funding. Oneal:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria; Analysis Group, Inc.: Research Funding. Sasane:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Vekeman:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Bieri:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding. Marcellari:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Magestro:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Adams:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding. Duh:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2671-2671
Author(s):  
Ismael Shaukat ◽  
Faraz Khan ◽  
Andrew Eisenberger ◽  
Marcus Stevenson ◽  
Alice J. Cohen

Abstract Abstract 2671 Background: Red cell transfusions play an integral role in the treatment and prevention of serious complications related to sickle cell disease. It has been shown that in other hemoglobinopathies, such as β-Thalassemia, patients (pts) suffer from iron overload which can result in end organ damage. There is concern that heavily transfused sickle cell pts may also develop iron overload with consequent morbidity and mortality. While pediatric pts routinely receive blood transfusions and iron chelation therapy, adult pts often discontinue chronic transfusion programs and are transfused sporadically. These pts may not receive routine iron chelation therapy. Methods: A retrospective review of our sickle cell database from 1988–2010 which also included those pts who were not routinely followed at the comprehensive sickle cell clinic. Adult pts (>18 yrs of age) with serum ferritin (SF) levels >1000 ng/ml (criteria for iron overload in our institution) were identified and use of iron chelation was reviewed in this population. Clinical characteristics evaluated were age, type of sickle cell disease, frequency of transfusions (chronic vs. sporadic), total units transfused, use and type of chelation, as well as reasons for non-use of chelation therapy. Results: 65/170(38%) pts were identified with SF >1000. The mean age is 33 years (range 19–70). 38/65 (59%) have the SS phenotype, 25/65 (38%) have the Sβ phenotype and 2/65 (3%) have the SC phenotype. The mean SF is 3697 ng/ml (range 1012–14312). Of those pts considered to have iron overload, 28/65 (43%) were treated with iron chelation: 27/65 (42%) received deferasirox and 1/65 (2%) received deferoxamine. Of the untreated pts, 24/37 (65%) had no identifiable reason for lack of chelation therapy, 10/37 (27%) had renal dysfunction, 1/37(3%) had hepatic impairment. 16/65 (25%) were transfused chronically, while 49/65 (75 %) were transfused sporadically. Chronically transfused pts received a mean of 81 units throughout their lifetime, while sporadically transfused pts received 30 units (p=0.01). The mean SF for chronically transfused pts was 5891, while the mean SF for pts transfused sporadically was 2981 (p=0.01). Of pts transfused chronically, 11/16 (69%) were on chelation therapy. Of the pts receiving sporadic transfusions, only 16/49 (33%) were on iron chelation (p= 0.01). In all pts chronically transfused, the reason for non-use of chelation therapy was renal dysfunction. In sporadically transfused pts, 33/49 (51%) had no identifiable reason for lack of chelation therapy. Conclusion: SF levels are significantly lower in pts who are sporadically transfused, though levels are high. Adult pts receiving sporadic transfusions are not routinely receiving iron chelation therapy despite elevated SF. The need for chelation therapy in both sporadically and chronically transfused pts remains to be determined. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (1, Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 69-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan R. Cohen ◽  
Marie B. Martin

2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (10) ◽  
pp. 782-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adlette Inati ◽  
Evelyne Khoriaty ◽  
Khaled M. Musallam ◽  
Ali T. Taher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document