Health Care
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

174198
(FIVE YEARS 76854)

H-INDEX

306
(FIVE YEARS 104)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Lucas ◽  
Emily Hadley ◽  
Jason Nance ◽  
Peter Baumgartner ◽  
Rita Thissen ◽  
...  

This exploratory study evaluates the use of machine learning classifiers to perform automated medical coding for large statistical healthcare surveys.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maja Bertram ◽  
Urs Steiner Brandt ◽  
Rikke Klitten Hansen ◽  
Gert Tinggaard Svendsen

Abstract Background Does higher health literacy lead to higher trust in public hospitals? Existing literature suggests that this is the case since a positive association between the level of health literacy and the level of trust in physicians and the health care system has been shown. This study aims to challenge this assumption. Methods Based on theoretical arguments from game theory and analysis of empirical data, we argue that the association is better described as an inversely u-shaped curve, suggesting that low and high levels of health literacy lead to a lower level of trust than a medium level of health literacy does. The empirical analysis is based on a study of the Danes’ relationship to the overall health care system. More than 6000 Danes have been asked about their overall expectations of the health service, their concrete experiences and their attitudes to a number of change initiatives. Results Game theory analysis show that the combined perceived cooperation and benefit effects can explain an inversely u-shaped relationship between social groups and trust in the health care system. Based on quantitative, binary regression analyses of empirical data, the lowest degree of trust is found among patients from the lowest and highest social groups, while the highest degree of trust is found in the middle group. The main driver for this result is that while patients having low health literacy perceive that the health care system is not cooperative, patients with a high level of health literacy have high expectations about the quality, which the health care system might not be able to provide. This reduces the perceived benefit from their encounter with the health care system. Conclusion It is important that health care professionals understand that some patient groups have a higher chance of cooperation (e.g., agreeing on the choice of treatment) or defection (e.g. passing a complaint) than others. In perspective, future research should undertake further qualitative examinations of possible patient types and their demands in relation to different health care sectors, focusing specifically on the opportunities to improve the handling of different patient types.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107755872110211
Author(s):  
Erin Brantley ◽  
Leighton Ku

Fluctuating insurance coverage, or churning, is a recognized barrier to health care access. We assessed whether state policies that allow children to remain covered in Medicaid for a 12-month period, regardless of fluctuations in income, are associated with health and health care outcomes, after controlling for individual factors and other Medicaid policies. This cross-sectional study uses a large, nationally representative database of children ages 0 to 17. Continuous eligibility was associated with improved rates of insurance, reductions in gaps in insurance and gaps due to application problems, and lower probability of being in fair or poor health. For children with special health care needs, it was associated with increases in use of medical care and preventive and specialty care access. However, continuous eligibility was not associated with health care utilization outcomes for the full sample. Continuous eligibility may be an effective strategy to reduce gaps in coverage for children and reduce paperwork burden on Medicaid agencies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Choolwe Muzyamba ◽  
Bob Mwiinga Munyati ◽  
Ogylive Makova ◽  
Geofrey Mushibi

Abstract BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has increased the prevalence of mental health illness around the world. While research has espoused these realities from the context of western countries, however, similar evidence from low income countries like Uganda is still missing. This is despite the fact that scholars have pointed out that given inadequate funding, health facilities and personnel to treat people with mental health challenges, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could be severe. Further, it is still unclear how locals in low income countries like Uganda manage to cope with mental health challenges given the lack of adequate skilled response, especially during a pandemic that has increased the pressure on the healthcare system. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap by investigating local people’s experience and handling of mental health burden during the COVID-19 pandemic n Uganda. Methods Qualitative primary data was collected from Uganda in November and December 2020. The sample selection involved a two-staged cluster sampling technique via the AfriSight online platform. Our study included a total of 1249 participants picked from the 4 different regions of Uganda. On the basis of this, thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results Our study revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated interventions contributed to the increasing mental health burden in Uganda. The four most pronounced forms of mental health illnesses included stress, anxiety, depression and traumatic disorders with the leading causes being closure of income-generating activities, fear of dying, sexual and domestic abuse. While a few people had access to skilled mantel health care, the majority of the people struggled to access this form of care. Skilled maternal care remained an attractive yet unattainable form of care for many. Thus, most people relied on various forms of local strategies that were feasible. ConclusionOur study revealed that Uganda was home to various local survival strategies that counter the inadequacies presented by the weak health care system. Particularly, a culture of reciprocity, family and community network forms important coping avenues for many left stranded by the lack of adequate skilled care. Thus, in the context of Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic, it seemed more logical to promote scaling up feasibly and locally-available solutions rather than idealistically focusing on attractive yet unattainable forms of care.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal Chopra

Purpose The purpose of the study was to apply Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to understand consumer motivation for preventive health care in India using content analysis. Design/methodology/approach Content analysis approach which is a qualitative-based approach was adopted. The responses were collected through semi-structured interviews using purposeful sampling method, and the responses were analyzed using content analysis approach. Sub themes and main themes were derived from the data which related to concepts in Maslow’s theory. Findings The results indicate the following: healthy food, healthy diet and health supplements are the basic need; sustainability of health and fitness and health security relate to safety and security need; feeling of pride in being fit, being a role model of fitness for others and influence of electronic media relate to social and self-esteem need; freedom from disease and peace of mind fulfill the need for self-actualization. Research limitations/implications To strengthen the external validity, a mix of alternate research methodologies adopting qualitative and quantitative approach need to be adopted. Practical implications This study will help to better understand motivation for preventive health care. It will enable health-care companies to design health-care marketing programs based on Maslow’s theory to motivate individuals to purchase health products. The public health-care departments can issue guidelines based on Maslow’s theory to motivate citizens toward preventive health care. Originality/value Maslow’s theory was applied in the context of preventive health care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Finza Latif ◽  
Sawssan Ahmed ◽  
Sumera Farhan ◽  
Felice Watt ◽  
Muhammad Waqar Azeem

Background & Objective: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused widespread psychological distress. The aims of the study were a) to assess mental health symptoms experienced by expatriate hospital staff and b) to determine the impact of staff wellbeing interventions specific to pandemic related stress. Methods: The study was conducted from June 2020 until August 2020. A 16-question survey was disseminated online via Survey Monkey to assess the mental health needs of hospital staff during the pandemic. Based on results, a virtual, tiered mental health support model was developed, and staff feedback was collected. Results: Almost 46.2% of respondents (N: 1001) reported at least one mental health symptom in the initial survey. The most common symptoms were anxiety, low mood and feelings of isolation. Being single and in poor health status were predictors of developing mental health symptoms (P <0.01). Female gender was a predictor for experiencing fear of getting infected. Time constraints at work was the most common reason for not accessing mental health support. Conclusions: As in other parts of the world, hospital staff in Qatar experienced mental health symptoms and significant fear related to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Being single and in poor health status were risk factors. Mental health interventions at work must take into account time constraints experienced by staff. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.7.4533 How to cite this:Latif F, Ahmed SR, Farhan S, Watt F, Azeem MW. Predictors of Psychological Distress in Health Care Staff in Qatar during COVID-19 Pandemic. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(7):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.7.4533 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e9
Author(s):  
Ezra S. Lichtman

Radical health reform movements of the 1960s inspired two widely adopted alternative health care models in the United States: free clinics and community health centers. These groundbreaking institutions attempted to realize bold ideals but faced financial, bureaucratic, and political obstacles. This article examines the history of Fair Haven Community Health Care (FHCHC) in New Haven, Connecticut, an organization that spanned both models and typified innovative aspects of each while resisting the forces that tempered many of its contemporaries’ progressive practices. Motivated by a tradition of independence and struggling to address medical neglect in their neighborhood, FHCHC leaders chose not to affiliate with the local academic hospital, a decision that led many disaffected community members to embrace the clinic. The FHCHC also prioritized grant funding over fee-for-service revenue, thus retaining freedom to implement creative programs. Furthermore, the center functioned in an egalitarian manner, enthusiastically employing nurse practitioners and whole-staff meetings, and was largely able to avoid the conflicts that strained other community-controlled organizations. The FHCHC proved unusual among free clinics and health centers and demonstrated strategies similar institutions might employ to overcome common challenges. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print September 16, 2021: e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306417 )


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0257270
Author(s):  
Norha Vera San Juan ◽  
Prisha Shah ◽  
Merle Schlief ◽  
Rebecca Appleton ◽  
Patrick Nyikavaranda ◽  
...  

Background The prominence of telemental health, including providing care by video call and telephone, has greatly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are clear variations in uptake and acceptability, and concerns that digital exclusion may exacerbate previous inequalities in access to good quality care. Greater understanding is needed of how service users experience telemental health, and what determines whether they engage and find it acceptable. Methods We conducted a collaborative framework analysis of data from semi-structured interviews with a sample of people already experiencing mental health problems prior to the pandemic. Data relevant to participants’ experiences and views regarding telemental health during the pandemic were identified and extracted. Data collection and analysis used a participatory, coproduction approach where researchers with relevant lived experience, contributed to all stages of data collection, analysis and interpretation of findings alongside clinical and academic researchers. Findings The experiences and preferences regarding telemental health care of the forty-four participants were dynamic and varied across time and settings, as well as between individuals. Participants’ preferences were shaped by reasons for contacting services, their relationship with care providers, and both parties’ access to technology and their individual preferences. While face-to-face care tended to be the preferred option, participants identified benefits of remote care including making care more accessible for some populations and improved efficiency for functional appointments such as prescription reviews. Participants highlighted important challenges related to safety and privacy in online settings, and gave examples of good remote care strategies they had experienced, including services scheduling regular phone calls and developing guidelines about how to access remote care tools. Discussion Participants in our study have highlighted advantages of telemental health care, as well as significant limitations that risk hindering mental health support and exacerbate inequalities in access to services. Some of these limitations are seen as potentially removable, for example through staff training or better digital access for staff or service users. Others indicate a need to maintain traditional face-to-face contact at least for some appointments. There is a clear need for care to be flexible and individualised to service user circumstances and preferences. Further research is needed on ways of minimising digital exclusion and of supporting staff in making effective and collaborative use of relevant technologies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document