MT4 Safety Warnings about Power Morcellation in Hysterectomy: A Simulation of National Impact

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. S12
Author(s):  
X. Xu ◽  
V.B. Desai ◽  
P.E. Schwartz ◽  
C.P. Gross ◽  
H. Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Gitas ◽  
A di Liberto ◽  
KA Ertan
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Nagdi Zaki ◽  
Aafia Mohammed Farooq Gheewale ◽  
Nada Ibrahim ◽  
Ibrahim Abd Elrahman

Abstract Background An adenomyoma is a well circumscribed form of adenomyosis and can be located within the myometrium, in the endometrium as a polyp, or extrauterine with the last being the rarest presentation amongst the three. With the ongoing advancement in gynecological surgery, the use of electromechanical morcellators have made the removal of large and dense specimens possible with minimally invasive techniques. However, it has also caused an increase in complications which were previously rare. Whilst the tissue is being grinded within the abdominal cavity, residual tissue can spread and remain inside, allowing for implantation to occur and thereby giving rise to recurrence of uterine tissue as a new late postoperative complication. Case presentation A 45-year-old woman presented with worsening constipation and right iliac fossa pain. Her past surgical history consists of laparoscopic supra-cervical hysterectomy that was indicated due to uterine fibroids. Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were done, which showed an irregular lobulated heterogeneous mass seen in the presacral space to the right, located on the right lateral aspect of the recto-sigmoid, measuring 4.5 × 4.3 × 4.3 cm in size. A transvaginal ultrasound revealed a cyst in the left ovary. The patient had a treatment course over several months that included Dienogest (progestin) and Goserelin (GnRH analogue) with add-back therapy. In line with the declining response to medications, the patient was advised for a laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. During the surgery, an additional lesion was found as a suspected fibroid and the left ovarian cyst was identified as pockets of peritoneal fluid which was sent for cytology. The surgical pathology report confirmed adenomyosis in both specimens, namely the right mass and the initially suspected fibroid. Conclusion In this case report, we showcase a rare occurrence of an extrauterine adenomyoma presenting two years post laparoscopic morcellation at hysterectomy. This poses questions regarding the benefits versus risks of power morcellation in laparoscopic hysterectomy.


Author(s):  
Xiao Xu ◽  
Vrunda B. Desai ◽  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Haiqun Lin ◽  
Peter E. Schwartz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. S83-S84 ◽  
Author(s):  
SL Cohen ◽  
SN Morris ◽  
DN Brown ◽  
JA Greenberg ◽  
B Walsh ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Sun ◽  
Xiaoxiao Lan ◽  
Haiyan Shi ◽  
Xueqing Wu ◽  
Bingjian Lu

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 208-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Purohit ◽  
Shreelata Datta ◽  
Nitish Narvekar
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aysen Boza ◽  
Selim Misirlioglu ◽  
Cagatay Taskiran ◽  
Bulent Urman

Objective. To evaluate clinical and operative outcomes of transvaginal extraction (TVE) and contained power morcellation (CPM) for myoma retrieval after laparoscopic myomectomy. Materials and Methods. Prospective data from 35 consecutive cases using CPM were compared with retrospective data of all cases using TVE from December 2014 to January 2017. Patients were matched 1:1 based on myoma diameter. A total of 62 women were included in the final analysis. Specimen retrieval was performed using the TVE or CPM within an insufflated isolation bag. Results. Age, body mass index, mode of prior obstetric delivery, history of previous abdominal surgery, indication for myomectomy, and the myoma(s) characteristics were similar between groups. Retrieval time was significantly shorter in the TVE group compared with the CPM group: 10 minutes (3-15 minutes) versus 17 minutes (14-42 minutes); P < .001. Time required for placement of the instruments was 9.7 minutes for the isolation bag and 0.5 minutes for the vaginal extractor. Additional analgesic administration for pain relief was necessary in 13 patients (42%) in the TVE group and 23 patients (72%) in the CPM group ( P = .01). Total cost of the hospital stay was significantly higher in the CPM group compared with the TVE group ( P < .001). Estimated blood loss and duration of hospital stay were similar between groups. Conclusion. Both CPM and TVE can be used for safe retrieval of large myomas that are removed laparoscopically. Compared with CPM, TVE was associated with a shorter retrieval time, less postoperative pain, and less hospital costs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aarathi Cholkeri-Singh ◽  
Charles E. Miller
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document