Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Reference data for the trunk and application in patients with chronic postherpetic neuralgia

Pain ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. 1002-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doreen B. Pfau ◽  
Elena K. Krumova ◽  
Rolf-Detlef Treede ◽  
Ralf Baron ◽  
Thomas Toelle ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihab U. Ahmed ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Lucy Chen ◽  
Abigail Cohen ◽  
Kristin St. Hillary ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Neuropathic pain is a condition resulting from injury to the peripheral and/or central nervous system. Despite extensive research over the last several decades, neuropathic pain remains difficult to manage. Methods: The authors conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, and crossover clinical trial to examine the effect of 1.5% topical diclofenac (TD) on neuropathic pain. The authors hypothesized that 1.5% TD would reduce the visual pain score and improve both quantitative sensory testing and functional status in subjects with neuropathic pain. The authors recruited subjects with postherpetic neuralgia and complex regional pain syndrome. The primary outcome was subject’s visual pain score. Results: Twenty-eight subjects completed the study (12 male and 16 female) with the mean age of 48.8 yr. After 2 weeks of topical application, subjects in 1.5% TD group showed lower overall visual pain score compared with placebo group (4.9 [1.9] vs. 5.6 [2.1], difference: 0.8; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.3; P = 0.04) as well as decreased burning pain (2.9 [2.6] vs. 4.3 [2.8], difference, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 2.6; P = 0.01). There were no statistical differences in constant pain, shooting pain, or hypersensitivity over the painful area between the groups. This self-reported improvement of pain was corroborated by the decreased pain summation detected by quantitative sensory testing. There were no statistically significant changes in functional status in these subjects. There were no complications in both groups. Conclusion: The findings indicate that 1.5% TD may serve as an effective treatment option for patients with neuropathic pain from postherpetic neuralgia and complex regional pain syndrome.


2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 837-843

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a psychophysical assessment of somatosensory system that complements neurological sensory examination. The information derived from QST presents the function of unmyelinated C-fibers, small myelinated Aδ-fibers, and large myelinated Aβ-fibers including their central pathways to the brain. QST may be performed by simple bedside method and by standardized method developed from the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz, DFNS). The standardized QST makes it possible to subgroup patients with peripheral neuropathic pain of different etiologies according to sensory profiles with emerging evidence showing predictive value of QST for treatment efficacy. Keywords: Quantitative sensory testing, Neuropathic pain, Sensory profile


Cephalalgia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1191-1201
Author(s):  
Pankaj Taneja ◽  
Camilla Krause-Hirsch ◽  
Stine Laursen ◽  
Caroline Juul Sørensen ◽  
Håkan Olausson ◽  
...  

Background Quantitative sensory testing protocols for perceptions of pleasantness and unpleasantness based on the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain protocol were recently introduced. However, there are no reliability studies yet published. Aim To evaluate the intra-examiner (test-retest) and inter-examiner reliability for orofacial pleasantness and unpleasantness quantitative sensory testing protocols. Methods Sixteen healthy participants from Aarhus University (11 women and five men, mean age 24, range 21–26 years) contributed. Two examiners were trained in performing the entire quantitative sensory testing protocols for pleasantness and unpleasantness, which included the additional dynamic tactile stimulation test using a goat-hair brush. Each participant underwent examination of both protocols by each examiner (inter-examiner reliability) on day 1. They returned at least 8 days following the testing to be re-examined by one examiner (intra-examiner reliability). All testing was performed on the skin of the right mandibular mental region. The intraclass correlation (ICC) was used to determine reliability. Results For the protocol investigating pleasantness, the majority of parameters had good to excellent intra-examiner (11/14: Intraclass correlation 0.67–0.87) and inter-examiner (13/14: Intraclass correlation 0.62–0.96) reliabilities. Similarly, the protocol investigating unpleasantness had good to excellent intra-examiner (intraclass correlation 0.63–0.99) and inter-examiner (intraclass correlation 0.65–0.98) reliabilities for most (13/15) of the parameters. Conclusion Intra and inter-examiner reliabilities in the majority of quantitative sensory testing parameters (apart from the summation ratio) investigating pleasantness and unpleasantness are acceptable when assessing somatosensory function of the orofacial region. Trial registration: NA


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document