Faculty Opinions recommendation of Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values.

Author(s):  
Henrik Kehlet
2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 837-843

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a psychophysical assessment of somatosensory system that complements neurological sensory examination. The information derived from QST presents the function of unmyelinated C-fibers, small myelinated Aδ-fibers, and large myelinated Aβ-fibers including their central pathways to the brain. QST may be performed by simple bedside method and by standardized method developed from the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz, DFNS). The standardized QST makes it possible to subgroup patients with peripheral neuropathic pain of different etiologies according to sensory profiles with emerging evidence showing predictive value of QST for treatment efficacy. Keywords: Quantitative sensory testing, Neuropathic pain, Sensory profile


Cephalalgia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1191-1201
Author(s):  
Pankaj Taneja ◽  
Camilla Krause-Hirsch ◽  
Stine Laursen ◽  
Caroline Juul Sørensen ◽  
Håkan Olausson ◽  
...  

Background Quantitative sensory testing protocols for perceptions of pleasantness and unpleasantness based on the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain protocol were recently introduced. However, there are no reliability studies yet published. Aim To evaluate the intra-examiner (test-retest) and inter-examiner reliability for orofacial pleasantness and unpleasantness quantitative sensory testing protocols. Methods Sixteen healthy participants from Aarhus University (11 women and five men, mean age 24, range 21–26 years) contributed. Two examiners were trained in performing the entire quantitative sensory testing protocols for pleasantness and unpleasantness, which included the additional dynamic tactile stimulation test using a goat-hair brush. Each participant underwent examination of both protocols by each examiner (inter-examiner reliability) on day 1. They returned at least 8 days following the testing to be re-examined by one examiner (intra-examiner reliability). All testing was performed on the skin of the right mandibular mental region. The intraclass correlation (ICC) was used to determine reliability. Results For the protocol investigating pleasantness, the majority of parameters had good to excellent intra-examiner (11/14: Intraclass correlation 0.67–0.87) and inter-examiner (13/14: Intraclass correlation 0.62–0.96) reliabilities. Similarly, the protocol investigating unpleasantness had good to excellent intra-examiner (intraclass correlation 0.63–0.99) and inter-examiner (intraclass correlation 0.65–0.98) reliabilities for most (13/15) of the parameters. Conclusion Intra and inter-examiner reliabilities in the majority of quantitative sensory testing parameters (apart from the summation ratio) investigating pleasantness and unpleasantness are acceptable when assessing somatosensory function of the orofacial region. Trial registration: NA


Author(s):  
Heidrun H. Krämer ◽  
Cora Rebhorn ◽  
Christian Geber ◽  
Frank Birklein

Abstract Objective To explore small fiber somatosensory and sympathetic function in PD and MSA. Methods We recruited 20 PD patients (7 women, median age 65.5 years; IQR 54.75–70.0), 10 MSA patients (4 women; median age 68 years; IQR 66.25–74.0), and 10 healthy subjects (HC; 4 women, median age 68; IQR 59.0–71.0 years). Autonomic testing included forehead cooling, intradermal microdialysis of norepinephrine (NE; 10–5; 10–6; 10–7; and 10–8), and orthostatic hypotension (OH); somatosensory testing included quantitative sensory testing (QST) according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS). Results OH occurred more frequently in PD (p = 0.018) and MSA (p = 0.002) compared to HC. Vasoconstriction responses were stronger in PD compared to MSA during forehead cooling (p = 0.044) and microdialysis of physiologically concentrated NE solutions (10–7; 10–8; p = 0.017). PD and MSA had impaired cold (PD: p < 0.01; MSA: p < 0.05) and warm detection thresholds (PD and MSA, both p < 0.05). The mechanical detection threshold was higher in PD (p < 0.01). Conversely, mechanical pain thresholds were decreased in PD and MSA (both p < 0.001), indicating mechanical hyperalgesia. Conclusion In contrast to MSA, we found evidence of peripheral adrenoreceptor hypersensitivity in PD, probably caused by peripheral sympathetic denervation. Sensory testing revealed peripheral neuropathy and central pain sensitization in PD and MSA. Jointly, our data demonstrate autonomic and somatosensory dysfunction in PD and MSA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document