Evaluating Success Rates After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: A Comparison of Clinical Definitions

Urology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 220-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Linder ◽  
Laureano J. Rangel ◽  
Daniel S. Elliott
2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Powell ◽  
Travis Dum ◽  
William Brant ◽  
Joshua Broghammer

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens M. Rosenbaum ◽  
Margit Fisch ◽  
Malte W. Vetterlein

Vesico-urethral anastomotic stenosis is a well-known sequela after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and has significant impact on quality of life. This review aims to summarize contemporary therapeutical approaches and to give an overview of the available evidence regarding endoscopic interventions and open reconstruction. Initial treatment may include dilation, incision or transurethral resection. In treatment-refractory stenoses, open reconstruction via an abdominal (retropubic), transperineal or combined abdominoperineal approach is a viable option with high success rates. All of the open surgical procedures are generally accompanied by a high risk of developing de novo incontinence and patients may need further interventions. In such cases, subsequent artificial urinary sphincter implantation is the most common treatment option with the best available evidence.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 442-442
Author(s):  
William S. Kizer ◽  
John A. Mancini ◽  
LeRoy A. Jones ◽  
Rafael V. Mora ◽  
Allen F. Morey

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L Guralnick ◽  
George D Webster

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document