scholarly journals Biologics in Shoulder and Elbow Pathology

Author(s):  
Eric D. Haunschild ◽  
Ron Gilat ◽  
Michael C. Fu ◽  
Nolan Condron ◽  
Brian J. Cole
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 85-107
Author(s):  
Sara M. Bahouth ◽  
Connie Chang
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra H Hildebrand ◽  
Betty Zhang ◽  
Nolan S Horner ◽  
Graham King ◽  
Moin Khan ◽  
...  

Background Radial head excision has historically been a common surgical procedure for the operative management of radial head fractures and post-traumatic conditions. With recent advances in other surgical techniques, controversy exists regarding its indications. This review evaluates the indications and outcomes of radial head excision in traumatic and non-traumatic elbow pathology. Methods Multiple databases were searched for studies involving radial head excision. Screening and data abstraction were conducted in duplicate. Only studies reporting outcomes for radial head excision were included. Results Twenty-seven studies with 774 radial head excision patients were included. The most common indications involved acute excision of comminuted radial head fractures (n = 347) and rheumatoid arthritis (n = 201). Post-operative functional scores after acute excision were reported to be good to excellent. In the chronic setting of rheumatoid disease, radial head excision resulted in improved range of motion, although pain was not effectively relieved. Discussion Outcomes of radial head excision for acute fracture are good to excellent; however, it should not be performed when concurrent or ligamentous injuries are present. Although some studies compared excision to open reduction and internal fixation or replacement, more data are needed to make proper conclusions. The strength of these conclusions is limited by the quality of included literature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gheorghe Burnei ◽  
Ionuţ Răducan ◽  
Florin-Daniel Enache ◽  
Adriana Dărăban ◽  
Cecilia Avram ◽  
...  

Background Context. The presence of special, rare and various forms which we can encounter when treating supracondylar humeral fractures (SHF) in children, call into question what therapeutic methods can be used to increase the effectiveness of the treatment applied. The aim of this paper is to present the results obtained by using double cross-fixation, "in double X", by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treating rare and particular forms. Comments and opinions on "double X" method and other cross or side configurations are presented. Patient Sample. All patients with rare and particular forms presented in this article, were operated during 2001-2020 in state and private hospitals. Fixation in "double X" was used either by CRPP and ORIF. The epitrochlear approach (EA) was performed in cases where stability by CRPP could not be ensured or when there were clear signs of ulnar nerve damage. The minimal medial-approach (mMA) highlights the epitrochlea and the fracture of the medial pylon; it has the role of anatomically reducing the medial pylon, thinner and very unstable in rare and particular forms. During 1982-2020 we consulted, treated and evaluated patients with SHF to whom all known treatment methods were applied: orthopedic reduction and immobilization in plaster cast, CRPP, ORIF, minimal-open reduction and internal fixation (mORIF) by mMA and external fixator. Internal fixation was done by the techniques of Judet, San Antonio, San Diego, Dorgan, in “X” and “double X”. In 2001, I introduced "double X" fixation to better stabilize anatomical reductions that showed signs of instability during intraoperative verification. All indications given in the study protocol have been made in accordance with the regulations mentioned in the experimental program. Results. All SHFs operated by CRPP and ORIF by “double X” were cured and satisfactory and good results were obtained in the neglected types operated between 14 and 60 days and good and excellent results were obtained in the rare forms. Conclusions. “Double X” fixation gives the best stabilization and postoperatively there is no need for immobilization in a plaster cast. Recovery may begin the day after surgery. Keywords: supracondylar fractures, child elbow pathology, cross-fixation, lateral fixation, healing and recovery after 30-45 days.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 247154921987034
Author(s):  
Srinath Kamineni ◽  
Matthew E Eads ◽  
Rasesh Desai

Elbow arthrodesis is an uncommonly performed operation, but it has a specific and niche place in the management of difficult elbow pathology. Many indications and contraindications have been reported, but one of the more challenging aspects of this procedure remains choosing the appropriate angle of fusion. Varying results have been reported along with speculations as to why the fusion may not have been obtained, such as lack of bony structure in the site. Common complications have also been reported most notably fractures distal to the plate. One area of future research is that of the reversibility of this procedure; going from a total elbow arthroplasty to an elbow arthrodesis has been studied well but not so for converting an arthrodesis to an arthroplasty. Elbow arthrodesis remains a valuable but niche solution for complex elbow pathologies that cannot be addressed with other commoner elbow operations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 831-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. S. L. Liem ◽  
C. Kolling ◽  
M. Marks ◽  
R. G. H. H. Nelissen ◽  
J. Goldhahn

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  

The elbow is a frequently underestimated and commonly misunderstood joint, leading to a considerable amount of clinical problems. A large part of this due to the largely overlapping and often unspecific symptoms of various diseases and injuries. A better understanding of elbow symptoms and the clinical exam of the elbow is the key to unlocking elbow pathology. This paper reviews a comprehensive and concise exam of the elbow that can easily be employed in a primary care sports medicine setting.


2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110329
Author(s):  
Alexander Barclay ◽  
Alireza Esfandiari ◽  
Matthew Nixon

This case report describes a traumatic elbow dislocation in a patient with congenital radioulnar synostosis. It discusses the difficulties and potential complications of managing this complicated injury. Congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS) is a rare elbow pathology that is characterised by the abnormal fusion of the proximal radius and ulna bones at the elbow. This case report describes a traumatic posterior elbow dislocation in a 30 year old patient with CRUS. Patients with CRUS are more susceptible to elbow dislocation due to laxity of stabilising ligaments and increased stiffness of the forearm leading to greater force transfer to the elbow. CRUS should be considered in patients with difficult to reduce elbow dislocations.


2021 ◽  
pp. 37-83
Author(s):  
Lindsay Stratchko ◽  
Lauren Ladd ◽  
Donna G. Blankenbaker
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document