W1032 Poor Bowel Preparation is Associated With Decreased Adenoma Detection in the Right Colon and a Reduced Overall Adenoma Detection Rate

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Kamel ◽  
Minh Nguyen ◽  
Rushabh Modi ◽  
David Oh ◽  
Gordon V. Ohning ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keshu Shan ◽  
Hongpeng Lu ◽  
Zhixin Zhang ◽  
Jiarong Xie ◽  
Lu Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Colorectal cancer on the right side of the colon has been suggested to be harder to detect by colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a second forward-view examination of the right side of the colon could increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and/or polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods This was a single-centre randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing colonoscopy were recruited and randomly assigned to the second forward-view examination (SFE) group, in which the right side of the colon was examined twice or the traditional colonoscopy (TC) group in which the colonoscopy was performed in a standard manner. The primary outcome was the ADR of right colon. The overall PDR and ADR, PDR of the right colon, per-adenoma miss rate of the right colon, and advanced lesion detection rate were also recorded and compared. Results A total of 392 patients were included in the study (SFE group 197 vs. TC group 195). The ADR and PDR of the right colon in the SFE group were significantly higher than those in the TC group (ADR 10.7% vs. 5.1%; P = 0.042); PDR 17.8% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.021). No significant difference was found in overall PDR/ADR, or advanced lesion detection rate between the two groups. Conclusions This prospective controlled study revealed that a second forward-view examination could modestly increase the ADR and PDR of the right colon during unsedated colonoscopies. This simple, safe and time-effective technique might be recommended for routine unsedated colonoscopy. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT03619122. Registered on 7/8/2018.


2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-785
Author(s):  
Madhav Desai ◽  
Nour Hamade ◽  
Mohammad Bilal ◽  
Venkata Subhash Gorrepati ◽  
Viveksandeep Thogulva Chandrasekar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. AB373
Author(s):  
Brunno José C. da Silva ◽  
Paula F. Botelho ◽  
Ricardo Ayres ◽  
Diego m. Ferreira ◽  
Rafael Machado ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-339
Author(s):  
Mir Fahad Faisal ◽  
Badar Hasan ◽  
Muhammad Shafiq ◽  
Jamie Varghese ◽  
Wendell K. Clarkston ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB392-AB393
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Triantafyllou ◽  
Paraskevas Gkolfakis ◽  
George Tziatzios ◽  
Lorenzo Fuccio ◽  
Cesare Hassan

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Bai ◽  
Jun Fang ◽  
Sheng-Bing Zhao ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
Yan-Qing Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Ideal bowel preparation for colonoscopy requires complete removal of fluid and foam from the colon. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is widely used for bowel preparation, with antifoaming agents such as simethicone commonly used in combination with PEG. Data on the effect of simethicone on the adenoma detection rate (ADR) were limited. This study therefore aimed to investigate whether preprocedure simethicone could increase the ADR. Patients and methods This was a prospective, multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial involving consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy in six centers in China. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: PEG plus simethicone or PEG alone. The primary outcome was ADR; secondary outcomes were quality of bowel preparation, measured by the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) and bubble scores. Results 583 patients were included. More adenomas were detected in the PEG plus simethicone group than in the PEG alone group (ADR 21.0 % vs. 14.3 %, P = 0.04; advanced ADR 9.0 % vs. 7.0 %, P = 0.38). The mean number of adenomas detected was 2.20 ± 1.36 vs. 1.63 ± 0.89 (P = 0.02). Patients in the PEG plus simethicone group showed better bowel cleansing efficacy: BBPS ≥ 6 in 88.3 % vs. 75.2 % (P < 0.001) and bubble scores of 1.00 ± 1.26 vs. 3.98 ± 2.50 (P < 0.001). Abdominal bloating was reported less frequently in the PEG plus simethicone group (7.8 % vs. 19.7 %, P < 0.001) than in the PEG alone group. Conclusion Combined use of PEG and simethicone is associated with a significantly increased ADR in a Chinese population.Clinical trials registration number: NCT02540239


2012 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. S788
Author(s):  
Jorge Zapatier ◽  
Alejandro Perez ◽  
Sandra Rodriguez ◽  
Anand Kumar ◽  
Roger Charles

2017 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. S84
Author(s):  
Eduardo A. Rodriguez ◽  
Diana Franco ◽  
Sarah Umar ◽  
Suryakanth R. Gurudu ◽  
Kevin Ruff ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document