A new enzyme immunoassay for PCDD/F TEQ screening in environmental samples: Comparison to micro-EROD assay and to chemical analysis

Chemosphere ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (14) ◽  
pp. 3313-3318 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Li ◽  
W.Z. Wu ◽  
R.B. Barbara ◽  
K.-W. Schramm ◽  
A. Kettrup
1990 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Chapman ◽  
B. A. Rush ◽  
J. Mclauchlin

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 30-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainara Gredilla ◽  
Silvia Fdez-Ortiz de Vallejuelo ◽  
Nerea Elejoste ◽  
Alberto de Diego ◽  
Juan Manuel Madariaga

1995 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Weimaster ◽  
William T. Beaudry ◽  
Paul C. Bossle ◽  
Michael W. Ellzy ◽  
L. Gail Janes ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Li ◽  
W. Z. Wu ◽  
Y. Xu ◽  
L. Li ◽  
K. -W. Schramm ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Harford

SUMMARYA total of 91 food and environmental samples were examined for the presence of salmonollao using a commercially available enzyme immunoassay kit (EIA) and a conventional culture technique. A 78% agreement was obtained, but re-examination of culture-negative, EIA-positive samples gave agreement of 86%. The problem of comparing EIA and culture results is discussed. A partially selective pre-enrichment broth was tested in 37 samples and gave better EIA ratios. Artificially contaminated cooked foods gave 100% agreement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document