Modified Pfannenstiel incision for intact specimen extraction after retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery

Urology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 830-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surena F Matin ◽  
Inderbir S Gill
2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (4S) ◽  
pp. 288-288
Author(s):  
Norikata Takada ◽  
Masayoshi Miura ◽  
Kanako Morooka ◽  
Tatsu Tanabe ◽  
Hiroshi Harada ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (7) ◽  
pp. 929-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Abarca ◽  
Kyle G. Cologne ◽  
Amanda Francescatti ◽  
Marc I. Brand ◽  
Theodore J. Saclarides

Minimally invasive surgery continues to evolve. Recent innovations have included single-incision access, robotic technology, and natural orifice dissection and/or specimen extraction. Many argue that there is minimal patient benefit to these advanced techniques. We report 39 patients undergoing laparoscopic ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis surgery, 17 of whom did not have a separate specimen extraction incision (Group 1). The specimen for this group was extracted through the circular incision made for the ileostomy; the pouch was constructed extracorporeally and returned to the abdomen through the stoma site. For the remaining 22 patients, a suprapubic Pfannenstiel incision was made (Group 2). No hand-assistance was used for either group. Group 1 showed a 45-minute reduction in operative time, a 1-day reduction in hospital stay, and a reduction in complications. Although these differences are modest, it shows that minimally invasive surgery is an evolving process. Small modifications may translate into significant advantages.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saleh Binsaleh ◽  
Ahmed Al-Enezi ◽  
Jihao Dong ◽  
Anil Kapoor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document