Physicians Weigh In On High Court Ruling

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
ALICIA AULT
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 101-125
Author(s):  
Michael Dwyer

Chapter five examines the Ring College immunization disaster, in which 24 children reportedly contracted tuberculosis and one 12-year-old girl died following routine anti-diphtheria immunization. The existing historiography relating to the Ring incident has, without exception, insisted that Burroughs Wellcome Ltd mistakenly supplied a bottle of live tuberculosis in lieu of a bottle of the anti-diphtheria serum toxoid-antitoxin floccules (TAF), even though this charge was not substantiated by a High Court ruling in 1939.This chapter provides new evidence suggesting that liability for the tragedy lay not with Burroughs Wellcome Ltd, but with the local attending doctor and his advisors, who mounted a conspiracy to cover up initial negligence in administering the immunization scheme and subsequent perfunctory medical treatment of the affected children.


BMJ ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 332 (7539) ◽  
pp. 443.4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Dyer

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 229-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Gur-Arye ◽  
Florian Jessberger

The issue of whether interrogative torture may ever be tolerated has been discussed explicitly by both the Israeli High Court of Justice and the Frankfurt Regional Court in Germany. The Israeli court ruling related to the use of interrogative torture in the war on terror; the case brought before the German court was one of routine police work. This paper analyzes the two rulings in depth and offers a comparative reading of the rulings. The comparative analysis reveals that, despite some fundamental differences, the Israeli and German rulings should both be seen as an attempt to uphold the ban on torture, on the one hand, and yet to grant fair treatment to an individual interrogator who used, or threatened to use, force in order to save innocent lives, on the other. While determining the lessons to be learned from the German and Israeli experiences, this paper raises doubts as to whether it is possible to keep the ban on torture intact while either excusing the individual interrogator (Israel) or significantly mitigating his punishment (Germany). The paper further suggests that, in order to provide a real barrier against the practice of interrogative torture, the evidence resulting from such interrogations should be inadmissible in any criminal proceedings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
ALICIA AULT
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Gerald Horne

This chapter looks at Patterson's imprisonment in Danbury, Connecticut. He estimated that “30 percent of the prison population is Negro” in Danbury, and they, along with those who were Jewish, were segregated. What particularly agitated him was the overrepresentation of Negroes behind bars. The plight of his fellow inmates presented Patterson with an immediate dilemma. The high-court ruling had yet to trickle down to this federal facility, so Jim Crow reigned. If he spoke out, “especially against segregation,” then that “would surely be un-American-subversive. I am not afraid to speak out,” he assured, “but I don't seek further victimization.” During his time of imprisonment, his mail was censored, then he was barred from writing anyone other than his spouse and his daughter. He was also subjected to “quarantine,” shielded from others, though not in solitary confinement. This meant no visitors and seven letters per week.


BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n219
Author(s):  
Duncan McGregor ◽  
Callum Phillips
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document