The exercise method of author's property rights on joint works of authors of choreographic work - focusing on the Seoul High Court ruling 2017Ra21187 ruled January 26, 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-147
Author(s):  
Ru-Ra Lee
2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
ALICIA AULT
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 101-125
Author(s):  
Michael Dwyer

Chapter five examines the Ring College immunization disaster, in which 24 children reportedly contracted tuberculosis and one 12-year-old girl died following routine anti-diphtheria immunization. The existing historiography relating to the Ring incident has, without exception, insisted that Burroughs Wellcome Ltd mistakenly supplied a bottle of live tuberculosis in lieu of a bottle of the anti-diphtheria serum toxoid-antitoxin floccules (TAF), even though this charge was not substantiated by a High Court ruling in 1939.This chapter provides new evidence suggesting that liability for the tragedy lay not with Burroughs Wellcome Ltd, but with the local attending doctor and his advisors, who mounted a conspiracy to cover up initial negligence in administering the immunization scheme and subsequent perfunctory medical treatment of the affected children.


BMJ ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 332 (7539) ◽  
pp. 443.4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Dyer

1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-176
Author(s):  
A. J. G. M. Sanders

The Matrimonial Causes Act, 1 of 1973 (Cap. 29:07 of the Laws of Botswana) was passed by the National Assembly on 27 October, 1972. It was assented to by the then President of Botswana, the late Sir Seretse Khama, on 2 February, 1973, and entered into force a week later on 9 February, 1973. The Act applies to civil marriages only, i.e. marriages concluded in terms of the Marriage Act (Cap. 29:01); customary law marriages have been excluded from its operation. As its short title indicates, the Act deals with matrimonial causes, that is to say divorce, judicial separation and the annulment of marriages and matters incidental thereto such as the property rights of spouses, custody, guardianship, maintenance and the jurisdiction of the courts.During its first 10 years of existence the Act has been the subject-matter of many a decision of the High Court and provisions of it have been considered also by the Court of Appeal. Most of these decisions deal with divorce. In academic circles, too, the Act received attention, witness the review by Chris Himsworth in theJournal of African Law. This review was written immediately after the Act came into force. An updated account is therefore appropriate. As I intend to approach the Act from a broader historical and jurisprudential angle, I will deal with it afresh rather than use Himsworth's penetrating but positivistic analysis as a frame of reference.


2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 229-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Gur-Arye ◽  
Florian Jessberger

The issue of whether interrogative torture may ever be tolerated has been discussed explicitly by both the Israeli High Court of Justice and the Frankfurt Regional Court in Germany. The Israeli court ruling related to the use of interrogative torture in the war on terror; the case brought before the German court was one of routine police work. This paper analyzes the two rulings in depth and offers a comparative reading of the rulings. The comparative analysis reveals that, despite some fundamental differences, the Israeli and German rulings should both be seen as an attempt to uphold the ban on torture, on the one hand, and yet to grant fair treatment to an individual interrogator who used, or threatened to use, force in order to save innocent lives, on the other. While determining the lessons to be learned from the German and Israeli experiences, this paper raises doubts as to whether it is possible to keep the ban on torture intact while either excusing the individual interrogator (Israel) or significantly mitigating his punishment (Germany). The paper further suggests that, in order to provide a real barrier against the practice of interrogative torture, the evidence resulting from such interrogations should be inadmissible in any criminal proceedings.


1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Ogden

The 1996 decision of the High Court of Australia in Wik Peoples v State of Queensland  will be remembered by all as the first fruits of the Mabo  decision.  Wik is the first of many decisions that will challenge Australia as it attempts to come to terms with the past.  The Wik case introduces the possibility that native title may indeed survive 'extinguishment' or at the very least may be subject to mere 'impairment' when conflict arises.  This is a consequence of the re-conceptualisation of property rights that the practical outcome of the case necessitates.  This article explains the move from 'co-existence' of rights to 'impairment' of native title to the possibility of the revival of native title.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Putu Eka Trisna Dewi

When the bank debtors did not make the payment, the bank as the holder of the mortgage is bound in the credit agreement by obtaining fulfillment of the debtor's credit through an auction process as mandated by law. Problems will arise if the auction winner cannot own or control what he has won because the debtor uses the auction process on the collateral. Then the winner of the auction is a buyer with ‘good faith’ who must be protected by law, and legal protection for the buyer with ‘good faith’ as stated in article 584 of the Civil Code of ‘good faith’ exists if the property rights are obtained through one of the means to obtain property rights, where from that article It is known that some of the transfer of existing property rights cannot be separated from the existence of the agreement law in the Civil Code. Legal remedies that can be taken by the injured parties during the auction execution by the court if there is a rebuttal due to the lawsuit made by the original owner which is later won by the court's decision of the original owner, then the auction holder can submit legal remedies to the high court to resolve the problem by way of an appeal to the Supreme Court. This is because selling through an auction is a civil selling effort and legal remedies that can be taken within the scope of civil law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document