scholarly journals SITE VARIABILITY IN 30-DAY AMPUTATION RATES AMONG PATIENTS WITH CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA UNDERGOING ENDOVASCULAR INTERVENTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 1224
Author(s):  
Jeremy Provance ◽  
John Spertus ◽  
Philip Jones ◽  
Matthew Bunte ◽  
Todd Vogel ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Alexander H. Shannon ◽  
J. Hunter Mehaffey ◽  
J. Michael Cullen ◽  
Irving L. Kron ◽  
Gilbert R. Upchurch ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 655-664.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Vierthaler ◽  
Peter W. Callas ◽  
Philip P. Goodney ◽  
Andres Schanzer ◽  
Virenda I. Patel ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Bosiers ◽  
Joseph P. Hart ◽  
Koen Deloose ◽  
Jurgen Verbist ◽  
Patrick Peeters

Endovascular strategies for the treatment of critical infrageniculate peripheral arterial occlusive disease exist and are becoming the primary methodology for such lesions at many centers. Although technically feasible for experienced operators, the evidence to support this strategy for below the knee (BTK) interventions is still evolving. We studied the 6-month and 1-year outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone, PTA with stenting, and excimer laser recanalization for BTK lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia. Between September 2002 and June 2005, 443 patients (355 Rutherford category 4, 82 category 5, 6 category 6) underwent intervention for 681 BTK lesions. Follow-up was performed at 6-month intervals after index intervention: limb salvage data were recorded and duplex ultrasonography was performed to measure the patency of treated areas. The primary patency and limb salvage rates of the entire population were 85.2% and 97.0% and 74.2% and 96.6% at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. Stratified for the treatment strategy (PTA alone in 79, PTA with stenting in 300 patients, and excimer laser in 64), 1-year primary patency rates were 68.6%, 75.5%, and 75.4%, whereas the limb salvage rates were 96.7%, 98.6%, and 87.9% for each modality, respectively. Endovascular intervention will become the primary treatment for BTK lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia, with 1-year primary patency and limb salvage rates that compare favorably with published surgical data. Prospective, randomized, multicenter trials will be needed to further establish the role of endovascular intervention in this challenging patient group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol Gupta ◽  
Michael S. Lee ◽  
Kush Gupta ◽  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Sarath Reddy

Author(s):  
Kunal Patel ◽  
Yulun Liu ◽  
Farshid Etaee ◽  
Chirag Patel ◽  
Peter Monteleone ◽  
...  

Background: There are limited data on differences in angiographic distribution of peripheral artery disease and endovascular revascularization strategies in patients presenting with intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb ischemia (CLI). We aimed to compare anatomic features, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes between patients with IC and CLI undergoing endovascular revascularization. Methods: We examined 3326 patients enrolled in the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease registry from 2006 to 2019 who were referred for endovascular intervention for IC (n=1983) or CLI (n=1343). The primary outcome was 1-year major adverse limb events, which included death, repeat target limb revascularization, or target limb amputation. Results: Patients with CLI were older and more likely to have diabetes and chronic kidney disease and less likely to receive optimal medical therapy compared with IC. Patients with IC had higher femoropopliteal artery interventions (IC 87% versus CLI 65%; P <0.001), while below the knee interventions were more frequent in CLI (CLI 47% versus IC 12%; P <0.001). Patients with CLI were more likely to have multilevel peripheral artery disease (CLI 32% versus IC 15%, P <0.001). Patients with IC were predominantly revascularized with stents (IC 48% versus CLI 37%; P <0.001) while balloon angioplasty was more frequent in CLI (CLI 37% versus IC 25%; P <0.001). All-cause mortality was higher in patients with CLI (CLI 4% versus IC 2%; P =0.014). Major adverse limb event rates for patients with IC and CLI were 16% and 26%, respectively ( P <0.001) and remained higher in CLI after multivariable adjustment of baseline risk factors. Conclusions: Patients with IC and CLI have significant anatomic, lesion, and treatment differences with significantly higher mortality and adverse limb outcomes in CLI. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01904851.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document