Effects of ureteral access sheath use on postoperative infection in retrograde intrarenal surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. e2384-e2385
Author(s):  
M. Karaaslan ◽  
S. Tonyali ◽  
M. Yilmaz ◽  
E. Olcucuoglu ◽  
S. Tastemur
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-365
Author(s):  
Prakash Chhettri ◽  
Anil Shrestha ◽  
Robin Bahadur Basnet ◽  
Parash Mani Shrestha

Introduction: To evaluate if retrograde intrarenal surgery with ureteral access sheath requires prestenting. In case pre-stenting becomes an option, how long does it need to be stented.  Materials and Methods: After obtaining approval from Institutional Review Board and informed consent, a prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Bir Hospital for 18 months. All the patients enrolled for retrograde intrarenal surgery were grouped into 3 groups: Group 1 – without pre-stenting, Group 2 – one week of pre-stenting, and Group 3 – two weeks of pre-stenting. Success was defi ned as an ability to accommodate a 10/12 F ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. Ureteral access sheath induced ureteric wall injury was also taken into consideration.Results: Among 179 cases, 152 cases were included in the study. In 36 patients out of 53 (67.92%) in group 1, 10/12 F ureteral access sheath was negotiable without pre-stenting, marking the frequency of distensible ureters. In 44 patients out of 47 (93.66%) from group 2 and all 52 patients (100%) from group 3, ureteral access sheath placement was successful after one and two weeks of pre-stenting respectively. Ureteric wall injury of grade1 and 2, was found in 9 patients (5.9%).Conclusions: The majority of ureters (67.92%) are distensible, not requiring pre-stenting before retrograde intrarenal surgery. One and two weeks of pre-stenting carries a success rate of 93.66% and 100% respectively.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e1271, S163
Author(s):  
E. Ozyuvali ◽  
U. Oguz ◽  
E. Damar ◽  
M. Yildirim ◽  
Y. Yildiz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
Md Nasir Uddin ◽  
Imtiaz Enayetullah ◽  
Kazi Zikrur Razzaque ◽  
Sharif Md Shahadat Ali Khan ◽  
Kazi Rafiqul Abedin

Background: Advancements in the endoscopic armamentarium, retrograde intrarenal surgery has become a viable and attractive option for the treatment of renal stones because of its high stone-free rates (SFRs) and low morbidity. Objective: To describe our experience and outcome of RIRS for the treatment of renal stones and to assess its effectiveness and safety. Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent RIRS for renal stones at our institute between January 2018 to December 2018 was performed. Surgical procedure: Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy using a standardized technique with last-generation flexible ureteroscopes (Flex-Xc) using Holmium-YAG laser. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Clinical data were collected and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed (Ureteral access sheath placement, operation time, hospital stay, stone free rate, post-operative blood transfusion & fever, need for second session of RIRS. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results and limitations: The mean overall stone size was 13±3 mm. Pre stenting done in all cases. Ureteral access sheath placement was possible in 54(90%) patients. At 1 month follow-up, the overall primary SFR was 86.67%(52 cases), the secondary SFR was 96.67%(58 cases).The mean operative time was 91.96±18.7 min. Mean hospital stay was 1.86±1.02 days. Complications were reported in 8 (13.33%) patients overall, with fever in 6 patients (10%), steinstrasse in 2(3.33%) patients need for second session RIRS in 6 patients (10%).No patient needed blood transfusion. The main limitation of the study is the retrospective nature. Conclusions: RIRS performed using a flexible ureterorenoscope marked the beginning of a new era in urology. It is safe and effective procedure and an alternative to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the treatment of selected renal stones. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 23, No. 1, January 2020 p.3-10


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-237
Author(s):  
Abhishek Thakur ◽  
Sudheer K. Devana ◽  
Aditya P. Sharma ◽  
Ravimohan S. Mavuduru ◽  
Girdhar S. Bora ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Oktay Özman ◽  
Hacı M. Akgül ◽  
Cem Başataç ◽  
Önder Çınar ◽  
Eyüp B. Sancak ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document