Survey of Isospectral Manifolds

Author(s):  
Carolyn S Gordon
1985 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshikazu Sunada

2008 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 49-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
HYUNSUK KANG

We generalise the compactness of isospectral metrics in the C∞-topology modulo gauge equivalence in dimension three to the case for Schrödinger operators with bounded potentials, as well as the finiteness of diffeomorphism types of isospectral manifolds.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 1850060
Author(s):  
Koen Thas

Nearly every known pair of isospectral but nonisometric manifolds — with as most famous members isospectral bounded [Formula: see text]-planar domains which makes one “not hear the shape of a drum” [M. Kac, Can one hear the shape of a drum? Amer. Math. Monthly 73(4 part 2) (1966) 1–23] — arise from the (group theoretical) Gassmann–Sunada method. Moreover, all the known [Formula: see text]-planar examples (so counter examples to Kac’s question) are constructed through a famous specialization of this method, called transplantation. We first describe a number of very general classes of length equivalent manifolds, with as particular cases isospectral manifolds, in each of the constructions starting from a given example that arises itself from the Gassmann–Sunada method. The constructions include the examples arising from the transplantation technique (and thus in particular the known planar examples). To that end, we introduce four properties — called FF, MAX, PAIR and INV — inspired by natural physical properties (which rule out trivial constructions), that are satisfied for each of the known planar examples. Vice versa, we show that length equivalent manifolds with FF, MAX, PAIR and INV which arise from the Gassmann–Sunada method, must fall under one of our prior constructions, thus describing a precise classification of these objects. Due to the nature of our constructions and properties, a deep connection with finite simple groups occurs which seems, perhaps, rather surprising in the context of this paper. On the other hand, our properties define in some sense physically irreducible pairs of length equivalent manifolds — “atoms” of general pairs of length equivalent manifolds, in that such a general pair of manifolds is patched up out of irreducible pairs — and that is precisely what simple groups are for general groups.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manlio Bordoni ◽  
Carlos Herdeiro ◽  
Roger Picken

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Manlio Bordoni ◽  
Verita Marino

1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Chen

AbstractIn this paper we examine the examples of isospectral but non-isometric Riemannian manifolds given by Milnor, Ikeda, and Vignéras. Of these, only Milnor's example is accounted for by Sunada's method of constructing isospectral manifolds, and even then only as an "unnatural" construction.


2013 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinpeng An ◽  
Jiu-Kang Yu ◽  
Jun Yu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document