scholarly journals On Differentiating a Matrix

1928 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. W. Turnbull

The theorem is well known. So also is the theorem that if concerning a determinant Λ and its reciprocal expressed by means of cofactors Aij of aij. Not quite so well known is the Cayley Hamilton theorem that a matrix X =[xij] satisfies its own characteristic equationUnlike as these three results are, they nevertheless can be looked upon as particular phases of a general theorem concerning a matrix differential operator acting upon a function of a matrix X or its transposed.

1948 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-294
Author(s):  
M. E. Grimshaw

It was proved by J. Williamson (1) that when C is any circulant matrix of order n and Ω is a certain diagonal matrix thenwhere ∥ C ∥ is the determinant of C and I is the unit matrix of order n. A simpler proof was given by U. Wegner (2), and later the characteristic equation of ΩC was discussed independently by L. Toscano (3). In the present note we prove the more general theorem that there corresponds to any matrix A of order n with simple elementary divisors a solution X of the equation (AX)n = ∥ A ∥ I. The theorem has a simple geometrical interpretation; the proof is almost immediate.


1931 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. W. Turnbull

The following work is a sequel to three previous communications, and more particularly to the first. The present object is to shew the effect of repeated operation with the matrix differential operator , when it acts upon a scalar matrix formed from an n rowed determinant |xij|, or sums of principal minors, the n2 elements xij being treated as independent variables. Thus when z is a scalar quantity ω z means the matrix [∂z/∂xij], whose ijth element is the derivative.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document