scholarly journals COMMUTATIVITY OF SKEW SYMMETRIC ELEMENTS IN GROUP RINGS

2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osnel Broche Cristo ◽  
César Polcino Milies

AbstractLet $R$ be a commutative ring with unity and let $G$ be a group. The group ring $RG$ has a natural involution that maps each element $g\in G$ to its inverse. We denote by $RG^-$ the set of skew symmetric elements under this involution. We study necessary and sufficient conditions for $RG^-$ to be commutative.

1980 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1266-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Merklen ◽  
C. Polcino Milies

Let RG denote the group ring of a group G over a commutative ring R with unity. We recall that a group is said to be an FC-group if all its conjugacy classes are finite.In [6], S. K. Sehgal and H. Zassenhaus gave necessary and sufficient conditions for U(RG) to be an FC-group when R is either Z, the ring of rational integers, or a field of characteristic 0.One of the authors considered this problem for group rings over infinite fields of characteristic p ≠ 2 in [5] and G. Cliffs and S. K. Sehgal [1] completed the study for arbitrary fields. Also, group rings of finite groups over commutative rings containing Z(p), a localization of Z over a prime ideal (p) were studied in [4].


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (02) ◽  
pp. 321-332
Author(s):  
A. P. Raposo

Given an involution in a group G, it can be extended in various ways to an involution in the group ring RG, where R is a ring, not necessarily commutative. In this paper nonlinear extensions are considered and necessary and sufficient conditions are given on the group G, its involution, the ring R and the extension for the set of skew-symmetric elements to be commutative and for it to be anticommutative.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (spec01) ◽  
pp. 1041-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. García-Delgado ◽  
A. P. Raposo

Given an involution φ : G → G in a group G and a ring R, we study the extensions, not necessarily linear, to an involution ψ : RG → RG in the group ring RG. We investigate the symmetric elements, those α ∈ RG for which ψ(α) = α, and give necessary and sufficient conditions for the set of symmetric elements, (RG)ψ, to be a subring of RG. This work is a generalization of [6] and references therein where only linear extensions of the group involution are considered.


Author(s):  
A. W. Chatters

AbstractWe shall give necessary and sufficient conditions on the ring R and the group G for the group-ring RG to be a prime P. I. ring with the unique factorisation property as defined in [5].


2005 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 127-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATHI CROW

Given a group G acting on a ring R via α:G → Aut (R), one can construct the skew group ring R*αG. Skew group rings have been studied in depth, but necessary and sufficient conditions for the simplicity of a general skew group ring are not known. In this paper, such conditions are given for certain types of skew group rings, with an emphasis on Von Neumann regular skew group rings. Next the results of the first section are used to construct a class of simple skew group rings. In particular, we obtain a more efficient proof of the simplicity of a certain ring constructed by J. Trlifaj.


1985 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jairo Zacarias Goncalves

Let KG be the group ring of the group G over the infinite field K, and let U(KG) be its group of units. If G is torsion, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for a finite subgroup H of G to be either normal or subnormal in U(KG). Actually, if H is subnormal in U(KG), we can handle not only the case H finite, but the precise assumptions depend on the characteristic of K.


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 169-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanyan Gao ◽  
Jianlong Chen ◽  
Yuanlin Li

A ring with involution ∗ is called ∗-clean if each of its elements is the sum of a unit and a projection. It is obvious that ∗-clean rings are clean. Vaš asked whether there exists a clean ring with involution that is not ∗-clean. In this paper, we investigate when a group ring RG is ∗-clean, where ∗ is the classical involution on RG. We obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for RG to be ∗-clean, where R is a commutative local ring and G is one of the groups C3, C4, S3 and Q8. As a consequence, we provide many examples of group rings which are clean but not ∗-clean.


1974 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Woods

The aim of this paper is to find necessary and sufficient conditions on a group G and a ring A for the group ring AG to be semi-perfect. A complete answer is given in the commutative case, in terms of the polynomial ring A[X] (Theorem 5.8). In the general case examples are given which indicate a very strong interaction between the properties of A and those of G. Partial answers to the question are given in Theorem 3.2, Proposition 4.2 and Corollary 4.3.


1979 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas S. Ford

AbstractLet R be a commutative ring with identity, and let A be a finitely generated R-algebra with Jacobson radical N and center C. An R-inertial subalgebra of A is a R-separable subalgebra B with the property that B+N=A. Suppose A is separable over C and possesses a finite group G of R-automorphisms whose restriction to C is faithful with fixed ring R. If R is an inertial subalgebra of C, necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of an R-inertial subalgebra of A are found when the order of G is a unit in R. Under these conditions, an R-inertial subalgebra B of A is characterized as being the fixed subring of a group of R-automorphisms of A. Moreover, A ⋍ B ⊗R C. Analogous results are obtained when C has an R-inertial subalgebra S ⊃ R.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (07) ◽  
pp. 1550099 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Visweswaran ◽  
Hiren D. Patel

Rings considered in this article are commutative with identity which admit at least one nonzero annihilating ideal. For such a ring R, we determine necessary and sufficient conditions in order that the complement of its annihilating ideal graph is connected and also find its diameter when it is connected. We discuss the girth of the complement of the annihilating ideal graph of R and prove that it is either equal to 3 or ∞. We also present a necessary and sufficient condition for the complement of the annihilating ideal graph to be complemented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document