Twenty years of experience in revision cochlear implant surgery: signs that indicate the need for revision surgery to audiologists

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (10) ◽  
pp. 903-907
Author(s):  
MO Batuk ◽  
BC Cinar ◽  
M Yarali ◽  
MD Bajin ◽  
G Sennaroglu ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo report device failures, audiological signs and other reasons for revision cochlear implant surgery, and discuss indications for revision surgery.MethodsRevision procedures between November 1997 and August 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Over 20 years, 2181 cochlear implant operations were performed, and 114 patients underwent 127 revision operations.ResultsThe revision rate was 4.67 per cent. The full insertion rate for revision cochlear implant surgery was 88.2 per cent. The most frequent reasons for revision surgery were: device failure (59 per cent), wound breakdown (9.4 per cent) and electrode malposition (8.7 per cent). The device failure rate was: 2.78 per cent for Advanced Bionics, 1.82 per cent for Cochlear and 5.25 per cent for Med-El systems. The number of active electrodes was significantly increased only for Med-El devices after revision surgery. The most common complaints among 61 patients were: gradually decreased auditory performance, sudden internal device shutdown and headaches.ConclusionThe most common reason for revision surgery was device failure. Patients should be evaluated for device failure in cases of: no hearing despite appropriate follow up, side effects such as facial nerve stimulation, and rejection of speech processor use in paediatrics. After revision surgery, most patients have successful outcomes.

2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (10) ◽  
pp. 2393-2399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Wang ◽  
Allen Y. Wang ◽  
Colleen Psarros ◽  
Melville Cruz

Author(s):  
C Thomas ◽  
J Westwood ◽  
G F Butt

Abstract Background YouTube is increasingly used as a source of healthcare information. This study evaluated the quality of videos on YouTube about cochlear implants. Methods YouTube was searched using the phrase ‘cochlear implant’. The first 60 results were screened by two independent reviewers. A modified Discern tool was used to evaluate the quality of each video. Results Forty-seven videos were analysed. The mean overall Discern score was 2.0 out of 5.0. Videos scored higher for describing positive elements such as the benefits of a cochlear implant (mean score of 3.4) and scored lower for negative elements such as the risks of cochlear implant surgery (mean score of 1.3). Conclusion The quality of information regarding cochlear implant surgery on YouTube is highly variable. These results demonstrated a bias towards the positive attributes of cochlear implants, with little mention of the risks or uncertainty involved. Although videos may be useful as supplementary information, critical elements required to make an informed decision are lacking. This is of particular importance when patients are considering surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 568-571
Author(s):  
Seita Fukushima ◽  
Noritaka Komune ◽  
Kenichi Kamizono ◽  
Nozomu Matsumoto ◽  
Kazutaka Takaiwa ◽  
...  

Although negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is widely used, its application to the head and neck region remains challenging due to anatomical complexities. This report presents the case of a female patient presenting with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes, uncontrolled diabetes and severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The patient had undergone cochlear implant surgery and five months later the wound was infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). NPWT was started shortly after removing the internal receiver and was stopped 11 days later. NPWT helped in controlling infection and led to a successful wound closure. In this case, NPWT was effective in treating infectious wounds around the auricle after cochlear implant surgery. Declaration of interest: The authors have no financial support for this article and no conflict of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.


2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 404-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussam K. El-Kashlan ◽  
H. Alexander Arts ◽  
Steven A. Telian

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document