Cochlear implantation in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders: role of transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and serial neural response telemetry

Author(s):  
S N Dutt ◽  
A Kumar ◽  
A A Mittal ◽  
S Vadlamani ◽  
S K Gaur

Abstract Objective To evaluate the utility of pre-operative transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and post-operative neural response telemetry in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder patients. Methods Four auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder patients who had undergone cochlear implantation and used it for more than one year were studied. All four patients underwent pre-operative transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response testing, intra-operative and post-operative (at 3, 6 and 12 months after switch-on) neural response telemetry, and out-patient cochlear implant electrically evoked auditory brainstem response testing (at 12 months). Results Patients with better waveforms on transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response testing showed superior performance after one year of implant use. Neural response telemetry and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response measures improved in all patients. Conclusion Inferences related to cochlear implantation outcomes can be based on the waveform of transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. Robust transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses suggest better performance. Improvements in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and neural response telemetry over time indicate that electrical stimulation is favourable in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder patients. These measures provide an objective way to monitor changes and progress in auditory pathways following cochlear implantation.

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (06) ◽  
pp. 414-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Hall ◽  
Steven D. Smith ◽  
Gerald R. Popelka

Accurate assessment of neonatal hearing screening performance is impossible without knowledge of the true status of hearing, a prohibitive requirement that necessitates a complete diagnostic evaluation on all babies screened. The purpose of this study was to circumvent this limitation by integrating two types of screening measures obtained near simultaneously on every baby. Peripheral auditory function was defined by otoacoustic emission results. A complete diagnostic evaluation was performed on every baby who received a "Refer" outcome for auditory brainstem response screening. The integrated results for auditory brainstem response screening in an unselected group of 300 newborns estimated sensitivity at 100%, specificity at 99.7%, overall referral rate at 2.0%, and a positive predictive value of 83.3%. Conductive loss associated with amniotic fluid in the middle ear can persist several weeks after birth; conductive loss can produce a "Refer" outcome for auditory brainstem response screening; and auditory neuropathy can be detected with screening measures. Prevalence results were consistent with the published literature. The implications of this study are that otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem measures provide much more information than either alone and that both are needed for a comprehensive hearing screening program.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna X. Hang ◽  
Patricia A. Roush ◽  
Holly F. B. Teagle ◽  
Carlton Zdanski ◽  
Harold C. Pillsbury ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 626-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana H. Kim ◽  
Paul R. Kileny ◽  
H. Alexander Arts ◽  
Hussam K. El-Kashlan ◽  
Steven A. Telian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 109861 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Behrman ◽  
Jessica L. Bishop ◽  
Jeremy Godsell ◽  
Brian Shirley ◽  
Sarah Storey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document