Absolute summability of infinite series on a scale of Abel type summability methods

1968 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babban Prasad Mishra

Suppose that λ > − 1 and thatIt is easy to show thatWith Borwein(1), we say that the sequence {sn} is summable Aλ to s, and write sn → s(Aλ), if the seriesis convergent for all x in the open interval (0, 1)and tends to a finite limit s as x → 1 in (0, 1). The A0 method is the ordinary Abel method.

1967 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babban Prasad Mishra

Introduction. In a recent paper, Borwein(1) constructed a new method of summability which would read: Letand let {sn} be any sequence of numbers. If, for λ > − 1,is convergent for all x in the open interval (0,1) and tends to a finite limit s as x → 1 in (0,1), we say that the sequence {sn} is Aλ convergent to s and write sn → s(Aλ). The A0 method is the ordinary Abel method.


Author(s):  
D. Borwein

1. Introduction. In this note Abel-type summability methods (Aλ) are defined and some of their properties investigated.Letand let {sn} be any sequence of numbers. Ifis convergent for all x in the open interval (0,1) and tends to a finite limit s as x → 1 in (0,1), we shall say that the sequence is Aλ-convergent to s and write sn → s (Aλ;). The A0 method is the ordinary Abel method.


Author(s):  
M. K. Nayak

We say a series is summable L iftends to a finite limit s as x → 1 in the open interval (0, 1) where


1970 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-H. Körle

1. The Cesàro methods for ordinary [9, p. 17; 6, p. 96] and for absolute [9, p. 25] summation of infinite series can be generalized by the Riesz methods [7, p. 21; 12; 9, p. 52; 6, p. 86; 5, p. 2] and by “the generalized Cesàro methods“ introduced by Burkill [4] and Borwein and Russell [3]. (Also cf. [2]; for another generalization, see [8].) These generalizations raise the question as to their equivalence.We shall consider series(1)with complex terms an. Throughout, we will assume that(2)and we call (1) Riesz summable to a sum s relative to the type λ = (λn) and to the order κ, or summable (R, λ, κ) to s briefly, if the Riesz means(of the partial sums of (1)) tend to s as x → ∞.


1932 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Fekete

§1. A serieshas been defined by J. M. Whittaker to be absolutely summable (A), ifis convergent in (0 ≤ x < 1) and f (x) is of bounded variation in (0, 1), i.e.for all subdivisions 0 = x0 < x1 < x2 < . … < xm < 1.


1967 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. N. Mohapatra ◽  
G. Das ◽  
V. P. Srivastava

Definition. Let {sn} be the n-th partial sum of a given infinite series. If the transformationwhereis a sequence of bounded variation, we say that εanis summable |C, α|.


Author(s):  
G. Das

Let be the given infinite series with {sn} as the sequence of partial sums and let be the binomial coefficient of zn in the power series expansion of the function (l-z)-σ-1 |z| < 1. Now let, for β > – 1,converge for 0 ≤ x < 1. If fβ(x) → s as x → 1–, then we say that ∑an is summable (Aβ) to s. If, further, f(x) is a function of bounded variation in (0, 1), then ∑an is summable |Aβ| or absolutely summable (Aβ). We write this symbolically as {sn} ∈ |Aβ|. This method was first introduced by Borwein in (l) where he proves that for α > β > -1, (Aα) ⊂ (Aβ). Note that for β = 0, (Aβ) is the same as Abel method (A). Borwein (2) also introduced the (C, α, β) method as follows: Let α + β ╪ −1, −2, … Then the (C, α, β) mean is defined by


Author(s):  
Hüseyin Bor

Let Σan be a given infinite series with partial sums sn, and rn = nan. By and we denote the nth Cesáro means of order α (α –1) of the sequences (sn) and (rn), respectively. The series Σan is said to be absolutely summable (C, a) with index k, or simply summable |C, α|k, k ≥ 1, if


1940 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 176-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Ince

The elliptic cylinder functions, or solutions of the Mathieu equationthat have the period π or 2π, are of four distinct species. These are denoted respectively by ce2n(x, θ), se2n+1 (x, θ), ce2n+1 (x, θ), se2n+2(x, θ), where n indicates the number of zeros in the open interval o < x < ½π. The object of this paper is to show that a function of any type can be expressed in terms of functions of other types, or of their derivatives. This provides the analogies to such trigonometrical relations asbut the single terms on the right-hand side of this and similar relations are replaced, in the results to be proved, by infinite series. These results are quite distinct from Whittaker's recurrence-relations (Journ. London Math. Soc., vol. iv, 1929, pp. 88–96); in particular, they do not involve the non-periodic second solutions.


1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Boris Miller

Let (G, ≼) be an l-group having a compatible tight Riesz order ≦ with open-interval topology U, and H a normal subgroup. The first part of the paper concerns the question: Under what conditions on H is the structure of (G, ≼, ∧, ∨, ≦, U) carried over satisfactorily to by the canonical homomorphism; and its answer (Theorem 8°): H should be an l-ideal of (G, ≼) closed and not open in (G, U). Such a normal subgroup is here called a tangent. An essential step is to show that ≼′ is the associated order of ≦′.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document